Everywhere: Hoist the Libraries folder to the top-level

Author: https://github.com/trflynn89
Commit: 93712b24bf
Pull-request: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/pull/2256
Reviewed-by: https://github.com/sideshowbarker

Libraries/LibJS/Tests/numeric-literals-basic.js

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// FIXME: Some of the test cases below are duplicated, presumably to test
+// uppercase as well which then got lowercased by Prettier at some point.
+
+test("hex literals", () => {
+    expect(0xff).toBe(255);
+    expect(0xff).toBe(255);
+});
+
+test("octal literals", () => {
+    expect(0o10).toBe(8);
+    expect(0o10).toBe(8);
+    expect(010).toBe(8);
+    expect(089).toBe(89);
+});
+
+test("binary literals", () => {
+    expect(0b10).toBe(2);
+    expect(0b10).toBe(2);
+});
+
+test("exponential literals", () => {
+    expect(1e3).toBe(1000);
+    expect(1e3).toBe(1000);
+    expect(1e-3).toBe(0.001);
+    expect(1e1).toBe(10);
+    expect(0.1e1).toBe(1);
+    expect(0.1e1).toBe(1);
+    expect(0.1e1).toBe(1);
+    expect(0.1e1).toBe(1);
+});
+
+test("decimal numbers", () => {
+    expect(1).toBe(1);
+    expect(0.1).toBe(0.1);
+});
+
+test("accessing properties of decimal numbers", () => {
+    Number.prototype.foo = "foo";
+    expect((1).foo).toBe("foo");
+    expect((1.1).foo).toBe("foo");
+    expect((0.1).foo).toBe("foo");
+});
+
+test("invalid numeric literals", () => {
+    expect("1e").not.toEval();
+    expect("0x").not.toEval();
+    expect("0b").not.toEval();
+    expect("0o").not.toEval();
+    expect("'use strict'; 0755").not.toEval();
+    expect("1in[]").not.toEval();
+    expect("2instanceof foo").not.toEval();
+});