We must reply to requests received from the client in the order they are
received. The wrench in this requirement is handling requests that must
be performed asynchronously, such as fetching the serialized DOM tree
from the WebContent process.
We currently handle this with a "block token". Async request handlers
hold a token that blocks any subsequent responses from being sent. When
that token is removed (i.e. the async request now has a response to be
sent), the async response is then sent followed by the blocked responses
in-order.
This strategy had a limitation that we could not handle an actor trying
to take 2 block tokens, meaning only one async request could be handled
at a time. This has been fine so far, but an upcoming feature (style
sheet sources) will break this limitation. The client will request N
sources at a time, which would try to take N block tokens.
The new strategy is to assign all requests an ID, and store a list of
request IDs that are awaiting a response. When the server wants to send
a reply, we match the ID of the replied-to message to this list of IDs.
If it is not the first in this list, then we are blocked waiting for an
earlier reply, and just store the response. When the earlier request(s)
receive their response, we can then send out all blocked replies (up to
the next request that has not yet received a response).
This is to prepare for an upcoming change where we will need to track
replies to messages by ID. We will be able to add parameters to this
structure without having to edit every single actor subclass header
file.
This is just to help make the message handlers a bit briefer. I had
considered adding a TRY-like macro to auto-return when the lookup fails,
but since statement expressions cannot return references, that would
result in a copy of all e.g. object and array lookups.
The "from" field is required in every response. It is the name of the
actor sending the message. This patch fills in the "from" field in the
Actor base class so that subclasses don't have to.
To aid with debugging web page issues in Ladybird without needing to
implement a fully fledged inspector, we can implement the Firefox
DevTools protocol and use their DevTools. The protocol is described
here:
https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/devtools/backend/protocol.html
This commit contains just enough to connect to Ladybird from a DevTools
client.
