The following tests also expose bugs before this PR:
- Layout/input/ol-render-item-values.html: negative ordinal values
- Layout/input/ol-render-deep-hybrid-list-item-list.html: ordinals
deep into the list owner subtree
We assume elsewhere that any abspos element's containing block must be
some kind of Layout::Box, so let's enforce that when deciding if a box
can be such a container.
This fixes a bad downcast on https://serpapi.com/
`BlockFormattingContext::compute_width()` stores the left and right
margins in the layout state at the very end of the function. However,
before doing so, it calls `FormattingContext::calculate_inner_width()`
which ends up calling `FormattingContext::calculate_stretch_fit_width()`
if the current box has `width: fit-content`.
Due to this, `calculate_stretch_fit_width()` would always see the
margins from the layout state as zero and therefore not take them into
account. Subsequently, the calculated width ended up being wrong.
Saving margins on the layout state earlier, before calling
`calculate_inner_width()`, makes sure that the width is calculated
correctly.
An earlier variant of the commit following this one introduced a
regression for the behavior tested here, but did not fail any in-tree
tests. So lets add an explicit regression test to make that easier to
catch in the future.
When marking a part of the layout tree for rebuild, if the subtree root
that we're marking has an anonymous parent, we now mark from the nearest
non-anonymous ancestor instead.
This ensures that subtrees inside anonymous wrappers don't just get
duplicated (i.e recreated but inserted instead of replaced).
This exposed a few bugs which caused the following tests to behave
incorrectly:
- `tab-size-text-wrap.html`: This previously relied on a bug where we
incorrectly treated `white-space: pre` as allowing text wrapping. The
fix here is to implement the text-wrap CSS shorthand property.
- `execCommand-preserveWhitespace.html`: We don't correctly serialize
shorthand properties. This is covered by an existing FIXME in
`CSSStyleProperties::serialized()`
- `white-space-shorthand.html`: The last 5 subtests here fail as we
don't correctly handle shorthand properties in
`CSSStyleProperties::remove_property()`. This is covered by an
existing FIXME in said function.
We used to subtract the maximum right margin of any containing box,
but we want to subtract the entire right margin instead. This yielded
incorrect intrusions for right floats not placed in the root.
When restructuring a block node inside an inline parent, if the
nearest block ancestor is `display: inline-block`, ensure that
the generated anonymous wrappers also have `display: inline-block`.
This fixes layout issues with block elements nested
inside inline-block elements.
Previously floats would be placed next to the highest float that
fitted the new float on its line. However, this violates the rule
that floats should be placed under the preceding float if it does
not fit next to it.
We were previously only testing for network errors, which includes e.g.
DNS resolution and connection errors. It does not include e.g. HTTP 404
responses, which is exercised by Acid 2.
Before this change, we were at the mercy of hashed pointer addresses
when processing fragment relocation in LayoutState::commit().
This made inline fragment order non-deterministic, causing layouts to
shift around seemingly randomly on page reload.
By simply using OrderedHashMap, we automatically get tree order
processing here. This fixes a bunch of flaky tests on WPT.
Originally part of a fix in 15103d172c, it
appears that this is no longer necessary and received a better fix in a
more recent commit. Resolves a visual regression with the ACID3 test.
We would only correct for the left margin of the containing block of the
child box that we are laying out, but we actually need to correct for
all left margins up until the containing block that contains both the
float and the child box.
Fixes#4639.
Browsers such as Chrome and Firefox apply an arbitrary scale to the
current font size if `normal` is used for `line-height`. Firefox uses
1.2 while Chrome uses 1.15. Let's go with the latter for now, it's
relatively easy to change if we ever want to go back on that decision.
This also requires updating the expectations for a lot of layout tests.
The upside of this is that it's a bit easier to compare our layout
results to other browsers', especially Chrome.
Whenever we introduce a block element in a container that at that point
has only had inline children, we create an anonymous wrapper for all the
inline elements so we can keep the invariant that each container
contains either inline or non-inline children. For some reason, we
ignore all the out-of-flow nodes since they are layed out separately and
it was thought that this shouldn't matter.
However, if we are dealing with inline blocks and floating blocks, the
order of the inline contents _including_ out-of-flow nodes becomes very
important: floating blocks need to take the order of nodes into account
when positioning themselves.
Fix this by simply hoisting the out-of-flow nodes into the anonymous
wrapper as well.
Fixes the order of blocks in #4212. The gap is still not present.
In 15103d172c we applied any remaining vertical float clearance to the
BFC's current Y offset for the next block to layout, because a `<br
style="clear: left">` could introduce clearance that would otherwise be
ignored. However, a `<div>` that floats _and_ clears `right` also
introduces this clearance and it is obvious that this should not push
down any subsequent blocks to layout in the current BFC.
Turns out, we don't need this change anymore. Some other later change
also fixed the underlying issue, and by getting rid of the original fix
we can now render https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SerenityOS correctly
again.
Fixes#4418.
There's a specific (and thankfully very common!) scenario where we can
actually skip calculating the automatic minimum size for flex items.
In single-line (no wrapping) flex containers, if the sum of all item
flex base sizes is <= the flex container's main size, we know that
none of the items will be shrunk by the layout algorithm.
And so for any flex item with definite main size AND automatic minimum
main size, we can treat the automatic minimum size as 0.
Before this change, we assigned the style sheet's location *after* its
content rules were parsed and added to it. This meant any `@import`s
would try to fetch their style sheet before they knew the URL they
should fetch it relative to.
When determining the content/margin box rects within their ancestor's
coordinate space, we were returning early if the passed in values
already belonged to the requested ancestor. Unfortunately, we had
already applied the used values' offset to the rect, which is the offset
to the ancestor's ancestor.
This simplifies the logic to always apply the rect offset after checking
if we've reached the ancestor. Fixes determining float intrusions inside
block elements with `margin: auto` set.
Fixes#4083.
If a block with inline children ends with a line break clearing any
floats, we not only need to take the introduced clearance into account
for the next line box, but the containing block needs to set the correct
height as well.
Since the spec calls for using the last line box' bottom as the resolved
height (if treated as auto), we now correctly apply the clearance to the
previous line box' bottom coordinate.
Fixes#4058.
We were accidentally providing it with absolute Y-coordinates, messing
up stacked floating boxes that would otherwise intrude on each other.
Fixes#4160.
Whenever we generate line boxes, we might end up with a residual
vertical float clearance by way of having a `<br>` with `clear: ..` set.
Set the Y offset of the next block level box to place by this vertical
clearance.
Relates to #4058.
We were introducing a line break and applying vertical clearance to the
inline formatting context, but that vertical clearance only applied to
new floating boxes. We should move the current block offset to the
vertical clearance to make sure the next line box starts beyond the
cleared floats.
There was a layout test for `<br>` with `clear: ..` set, but that test
did not actually do anything - removing the `clear` property would
result in the same layout. Replace that test with something that
actually tests float clearing.
Relates to #4058.
Our recent change to get rid of the "move 1px at a time" algorithm in
the float positioning logic introduced the issue that potentially
intersecting float boxes were not evaluated in order anymore. This could
result in float boxes being pushed down further than strictly necessary.
By finding the highest point we can move the floating box to and
repeating the process until we're no longer intersecting any floating
box, we also solve some edge cases like intersecting with very long
floating boxes whose edges lay outside the current box' edges.
This is by no means the most efficient solution, but it is more correct
than what we had until now.
Fixes#4110.
We used to always clear the side data after encountering a box with
`clear: ..`, but this is not the right thing to do if that same box also
has `float: ..` set. For example, with `clear: right` and `float: left`
it might be that the next box still wants to clear the right side, and
since the previous box is floating it did not push the next box down far
enough to justify clearing the side data at that point.
This changes the logic to only clear the float side if the clearing box
itself is not floating. We also no longer clear the opposite side after
placing a floating box; that doesn't seem to be necessary anymore.
Fixes#4102.
When generating line boxes, we place floats simultaneously with the
other items on the same line. The CSS text spec requires us to trim the
whitespace at the end of each line, but we only did so after laying out
all the line boxes.
This changes the way we calculate the current line box width for floats
by subtracting the amount of pixels that the current trailing whitespace
is using.
Fixes#4050.
It's safe to remove this pointer because intrinsic layout should never
look up a box's state beyond its containing block.
This change affects the expectations of two layout tests, but both
already differ slightly from other browsers, and the difference between
expectations is less than 5px.
All abspos boxes are expected to be blockified, so we are certain that
we can ignore non-box elements when collecting abspos nodes for layout.
Fixes a crash caused by an attempt to cast a BreakNode to a Box while
performing abspos layout.
Quite simply, ignore any declarations for properties we don't want,
while computing a pseudo-element's style.
I've imported a WPT test for this, which fails without this patch.
