There are multiple things happening here which are interconnected:
- We now use AbstractElement to refer to the source of a counter, which
means we also need to pass that around to compute `content`.
- Give AbstractElement new helper methods that are needed by
CountersSet, so it doesn't have to care whether it's dealing with a
true Element or PseudoElement.
- The CountersSet algorithms now walk the layout tree instead of DOM
tree, so TreeBuilder needs to wait until the layout node exists
before it resolves counters for it.
- Resolve counters when creating a pseudo-element's layout node. We
awkwardly compute the `content` value up to twice: Once to figure out
what kind of node we need to make, and then if it's a string, we do
so again after counters are resolved so we can get the true value of
any `counter()` functions. This will need adjusting in the future but
it works for now.
We've long claimed to support this, but then silently ignored string
values, until 4cb2063577 which would
not-so-silently crash instead. (Oops)
So, actually pass the string value along and use it in the list marker.
As part of this, rename our `list-style-type` enum to
`counter-style-name-keyword`. This is an awkward name, attempting to be
spec-based. (The spec says `<counter-style>`, which is either a
`<counter-style-name>` or a function, and the `<counter-style-name>` is
a `<custom-ident>` that also has a few predefined values. So this is the
best I could come up with.)
Unfortunately only one WPT test for this passes - the others fail
because we produce a different layout when text is in `::before` than
when it's in `::marker`, and similar issues.
