Instead of trying to locate the relevant StyleSheetList on style element
removal from the DOM, we now simply keep a pointer to the list instead.
This fixes an issue where using attachShadow() on an element that had
a declarative shadow DOM would cause any style elements present to use
the wrong StyleSheetList when removing themselves from the tree.
Before this change, removing a style element from inside a shadow tree
would cause it to be unregistered with the document-level list of sheets
instead of the shadow-root-level list.
This would eventually lead to a verification failure if someone tried to
update the text contents of that style element, since it was still in
the shadow-root-level list, but now with a null owner element.
Fixes a crash on https://www.swedbank.se/
This was resulting in a whole lot of rebuilding whenever a new IDL
interface was added.
Instead, just directly include the prototype in every C++ file which
needs it. While we only really need a forward declaration in each cpp
file; including the full prototype header (which itself only includes
LibJS/Object.h, which is already transitively brought in by
PlatformObject) - it seems like a small price to pay compared to what
feels like a full rebuild of LibWeb whenever a new IDL file is added.
Given all of these includes are only needed for the ::initialize
method, there is probably a smart way of avoiding this problem
altogether. I've considered both using some macro trickery or generating
these functions somehow instead.
This commit introduces a WEB_SET_PROTOTYPE_FOR_INTERFACE macro that
caches the interface name in a local static FlyString. This means that
we only pay for FlyString-from-literal lookup once per browser lifetime
instead of every time the interface is instantiated.
With this change, we now have ~1200 CellAllocators across both LibJS and
LibWeb in a normal WebContent instance.
This gives us a minimum heap size of 4.7 MiB in the scenario where we
only have one cell allocated per type. Of course, in practice there will
be many more of each type, so the effective overhead is quite a bit
smaller than that in practice.
I left a few types unconverted to this mechanism because I got tired of
doing this. :^)
The `<style>` element is allowed to be in the SVG namespace, so we now
support this element.
It has the same behaviour as the HTML namespace `<style>` element as
described in the spec.
"The semantics and processing of a ‘style’ and its attributes must be
the same as is defined for the HTML ‘style’ element."
