If selector does not have any descendant combinators then we know for
sure it won't be filtered out by ancestor filter, which means there is
no need to check for it.
This change makes hover style invalidation go faster on Discord where
with this change we spend 4-5% in `should_reject_with_ancestor_filter()`
instead of 20%.
Before this change, checking if fast selector matching could be used was
only enabled in style recalculation and hover invalidation. With this
change it's enabled for all callers of SelectorEngine::matches() by
default. This way APIs like `Element.matches()` and `querySelector()`
could take advantage of this optimization.
Previously, we optimized hover style invalidation to mark for style
updates only those elements that were matched by :hover selectors in the
last style calculation.
This change takes it a step further by invalidating only the elements
where the set of selectors that use :hover changes after hovered element
is modified. The implementation is as follows:
1. Collect all elements whose styles might be affected by a change in
the hovered element.
2. Retrieve a list of all selectors that use :hover.
3. Test each selector against each element and record which selectors
match.
4. Update m_hovered_node to the newly hovered element.
5. Repeat step 3.
6. For each element, compare the previous and current sets of matched
selectors. If they differ, mark the element for style recalculation.
Details' contents matches a new details-content pseudo element.
Further work is required to make this pseudo-element behave per spec.
This pseudo should be element-backed per
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-pseudo/#element-backed
After we absolutize the contents of :has(), we check that those child
selectors don't contain anything that :has() rejects.
This is a separate path than the checks inside the parser, which is
unfortunate.
Fixes a WPT ref test. :^)
It's possible for absolutizing a selector to return an invalid selector
(eg, it could cause `:has()` inside `:has()`) so we need to be able to
express that.
Attempt 2! Reverts 2a5dbedad4
This time, set up a different combinator when producing a relative
invalid selector rather than a standalone one. This fixes the crash.
Original description below for simplicity because it still applies.
---
Selectors like `:is(.valid, &!?!?!invalid)` need to keep the invalid
part around, even though it will never match, for a couple of reasons:
- Serialization needs to include them
- For nesting, we care if a `&` appeared anywhere in the selector, even
in an invalid part.
So this patch introduces an `Invalid` simple selector type, which simply
holds its original ComponentValues. We search through these looking for
`&`, and we dump them out directly when asked to serialize.
Selectors like `:is(.valid, &!?!?!invalid)` need to keep the invalid
part around, even though it will never match, for a couple of reasons:
- Serialization needs to include them
- For nesting, we care if a `&` appeared anywhere in the selector, even
in an invalid part.
So this patch introduces an `Invalid` simple selector type, which simply
holds its original ComponentValues. We search through these looking for
`&`, and we dump them out directly when asked to serialize.
Instead of storing the three-part specificy for every selector,
just mash them together into a 32-bit value instead.
This saves both space and time, and matches the behavior of other
browser engines.
