positioned element is a descendant of inline-block
Sets inline block offsets in InlineFormattingContext.cpp, but this is
not enough. When static position rect is calculated during layout,
not all ancestors of abspos box may have their offsets calculated yet
(more info here: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/pull/2583#issuecomment-2507140272).
So now static position rect is calculated relative to static containing
block during layout and calculation relative to actual containing block
is done later in
FormattingContext::layout_absolutely_positioned_element.
Fixes wpt/css/CSS2/abspos/static-inside-inline-block.html
Fixes underinvalidation caused by resolving text-decoration-thickness
during layout commit, while this property can be invalidated
independently of layout.
Instead of directly invoking `to_px()`,
`calculate_min_content_contribution()` needs to use
`calculate_inner_width()` and `calculate_inner_height()`, which are
aware of how to correctly handle `min-content` and `max-content` values.
Fixes https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/issues/3469
Height resolution assumes that when available space is definite, it
matches the size of non-anonymous containing block. With this change, we
correctly maintain this assumption when box is wrapped in anonymous
node.
Fixes https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/issues/3422
Before this change, the layout tree for slots was only updated after
creating a layout node for the slot itself. This was not enough to
account for partial layout tree rebuilds when the slot content changed.
With this change, we always recurse into the slot content.
Fixes expanding and collapsing of nodes in DOM tree inspector broken in
9b26f7eb0f
12c6ac78e2 with fixed mistake when cache
slot is copied instead of being referenced:
```cpp
auto cache =
box.cached_intrinsic_sizes().min_content_height.ensure(width);
```
while it should've been:
```cpp
auto& cache =
box.cached_intrinsic_sizes().min_content_height.ensure(width);
```
This change moves intrinsic sizes cache from
LayoutState, which is local to current layout run,
to layout nodes, so it could be reused between
layout runs. This optimization is possible because
we can guarantee that these measurements will
remain unchanged unless the style of the element
or any of its descendants changes.
For now, invalidation is implemented simply by
resetting cache on whole ancestors chain once we
figured that element needs layout update.
The case when layout is invalidated by DOM's
structural changes is covered by layout tree
invalidation that drops intrinsic sizes cache
along with layout nodes.
I measured improvement on couple websites:
- Mail list on GMail 28ms -> 6ms
- GitHub large code page 47ms -> 36ms
- Discord chat history 15ms -> 8ms
(Time does not include `commit()`)
We don't need to perform inside layout of flex and grid formatting
contexts when one of their ancestors is undergoing intrinsic size
measurement. This is because the parent formatting context will have
already sized the flex/grid container, and thus inside layout is
completely redundant work.
We already have a check to skip the layout of descendants if the
available size is intrinsic, but this is not sufficient in nested
intrinsic layout cases, where the available size might be definite even
though we are in intrinsic layout mode.
We already have a check to skip the layout of descendants if the
available size is intrinsic, but this is not sufficient in nested
intrinsic layout cases, where the available size might be definite even
though we are in intrinsic layout mode.
Before this change, an element masked with 'mask-image: url(...)' would
show the mask, but 'mask: url(...)' would not. On e.g. dialogic.nl it
would show white boxes instead of the actual images in the top
navigation bar. We still do not support many of the other mask
properties, but with this change at least the masks show up in both
cases.
Before this change, we were always processing all row groups first,
and then all rows. This led to incorrect table layouts when rows and row
groups were encountered in anything but that order.
This essentially reverts 1b46a52cfc
and adds more tests.
The reverted change was an incorrect workaround for the real issue,
which was that we weren't creating anonymous wrapper boxes around inline
children of table-cell boxes.
Now that this has been fixed, we can go back to aligning text properly.
This fixes an issue where CSS vertical-align on a table-cell box would
incorrectly apply to both the table-cell box and any inline content it
had inside.
This reduces the number of `.cpp` files that need to be recompiled when
one of the below header files changes as follows:
CSS/ComputedProperties.h: 1113 -> 49
CSS/ComputedValues.h: 1120 -> 209
This reduces the number of `.cpp` files that need to be recompiled when
one of the below header files changes as follows:
Painting/Command.h: 1030 -> 61
Painting/DisplayList.h: 1030 -> 60
Painting/DisplayListRecorder.h: 557 -> 59
Even though we don't actually make use of these values at the moment,
we still want them to be reflected correctly once we start exposing used
margin values soon.
We were incorrectly shrinking the used right margin to make it fit
within the available space, even though this was not necessary and the
margin is allowed to stretch beyond the containing block.
This is not observable yet, but will be once we start exposing used
margin values in a subsequent change.
By the time we're measuring the height of a BFC root, we've already
collapsed all relevant margins for the root and its descendants.
Given this, we should simply use 0 (relative to the BFC root) as the
lowest block axis coordinate (i.e Y value) for the margin edges.
This fixes a long-standing issue where BFC roots were sometimes not tall
enough to contain their children due to margins.
This fixes an issue where `vertical-align: middle` would incorrectly
shift the text away from the natural alphabetic baseline.
Fixing this makes many WPT table tests work correctly, so I'm also
importing one of them here. :^)
Having one big `if` to determine whether or not we should restructure an
inline layout node became a bit unwieldy. This extracts the logic into a
separate method.
When restructuring inline nodes because of a block element insertion
during the layout tree build, we might end up with a `display: contents`
element in the ancestor stack that is not part of the actual layout
tree, since it's never actually used as a parent for any node. Because
we were only rewinding the ancestor stack with actual new layout nodes,
it became corrupted and layout nodes were added to the wrong parent.
This new logic leaves the ancestor stack intact, only replacing layout
nodes whenever a new one is created.
Fixes the sidebar on https://reddit.com.
Fixes#3590.
When drawing a table, some of the CSS properties must be moved from the
table grid box to an anonamyous table wrapper box. One of these
properties is `position`. `z-index` however is not. This leads to the
following behavior if a table has both `position` and `z-index`:
* The wrapper box has the `position`, but a `z-index` of `auto`.
* The grid box has the `z-index`, but `position: static`.
This effectively means that the `z-index property is ignored since it
has no effect on non-positioned elements. This behavior contradicts what
other browsers do and causes layout issues on websites.
To align Ladybird behavior with other browser this commit also moves the
`z-index` property to the wrapper box.
This was an old hack intended to make percentage sizes on flex items
before we had implemented the appropriate special behavior of definite
sizes in flex layout.
Removing it makes flex layout less magical and should not change
behavior in any observable way.
The spec tells us to treat `auto` as `fit-content` when determining
flex item cross sizes, so let's just do *that* instead of awkwardly
doing an uncacheable nested layout of the item.
This was the only instance of `LayoutState` nesting outside of intrinsic
sizing, so removing it is an important step towards simplifying layout.
Turns out it was a lot easier than expected.
We've long claimed to support this, but then silently ignored string
values, until 4cb2063577 which would
not-so-silently crash instead. (Oops)
So, actually pass the string value along and use it in the list marker.
As part of this, rename our `list-style-type` enum to
`counter-style-name-keyword`. This is an awkward name, attempting to be
spec-based. (The spec says `<counter-style>`, which is either a
`<counter-style-name>` or a function, and the `<counter-style-name>` is
a `<custom-ident>` that also has a few predefined values. So this is the
best I could come up with.)
Unfortunately only one WPT test for this passes - the others fail
because we produce a different layout when text is in `::before` than
when it's in `::marker`, and similar issues.
This was an old hack from before we understood how and when to resolve
percentages in flex layout. Removing it should not change anything,
but it does avoid a lot of redundant layout work on many pages.
