We can use caching in a million more places. This is just me running JS
benchmarks and looking at which get() call sites were hot and putting
caches there.
Lots of nice speedups all over the place, some examples:
1.19x speedup on Octane/raytrace.js
1.13x speedup on Octane/earley-boyer.js
1.12x speedup on Kraken/ai-astar.js
1.10x speedup on Octane/box2d.js
1.08x speedup on Octane/gbemu.js
1.05x speedup on Octane/regexp.js
- Create less GC pressure by making each `await` in async function skip
iteration result object allocation.
- Skip uncached `Object::get()` calls to extract `value` and `done` from
the iteration result object.
With this change, following function goes 30% faster on my computer:
```js
(async () => {
const resolved = Promise.resolve();
for (let i = 0; i < 5_000_000; i++) {
await resolved;
}
})();
```
The special empty value (that we use for array holes, Optional<Value>
when empty and a few other other placeholder/sentinel tasks) still
exists, but you now create one via JS::js_special_empty_value() and
check for it with Value::is_special_empty_value().
The main idea here is to make it very unlikely to accidentally create an
unexpected special empty value.
Instead of returning internal generator results as ordinary JS::Objects
with properties, we now use GeneratorResult and CompletionCell which
both inherit from Cell directly and allow efficient access to state.
1.59x speedup on JetStream3/lazy-collections.js :^)
From what I understand, the suspension steps are not required now,
or in the future for our implementation, or any other. The intent
is already implemented in the spec pushing on another execution
context to the stack and leaving the running execution context as-is.
The resume steps are a slightly different story as there is some subtle
behavior which the spec is trying to convey where some custom logic may
need to be done when one execution context changes from one to another.
It may be worth implementing those steps at a later point in time so
that this behavior is a bit easier to follow in those cases.
To make the situation more confusing - from what I can gather from the
spec, not all cases that the spec mentions resume actually means
anything normative. Resume is only _actually_ needed in a limited set
of locations.
For now, let's just remove the unneeded FIXMEs that indicate that there
is something to be done for the suspension steps, as there is not, and
leave the resume steps as is.
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
The main motivation behind this is to remove JS specifics of the Realm
from the implementation of the Heap.
As a side effect of this change, this is a bit nicer to read than the
previous approach, and in my opinion, also makes it a little more clear
that this method is specific to a JavaScript Realm.
