We previously had PropertyOwningCSSStyleDeclaration and
ResolvedCSSStyleDeclaration, representing the current style properties
and resolved style respectively. Both of these were the
CSSStyleDeclaration type in the CSSOM. (We also had
ElementInlineCSSStyleDeclaration but I removed that in a previous
commit.)
In the meantime, the spec has changed so that these should now be a new
CSSStyleProperties type in the CSSOM. Also, we need to subclass
CSSStyleDeclaration for things like CSSFontFaceRule's list of
descriptors, which means it wouldn't hold style properties.
So, this commit does the fairly messy work of combining these two types
into a new CSSStyleProperties class. A lot of what previously was done
as separate methods in the two classes, now follows the spec steps of
"if the readonly flag is set, do X" instead, which is hopefully easier
to follow too.
There is still some functionality in CSSStyleDeclaration that belongs in
CSSStyleProperties, but I'll do that next. To avoid a huge diff for
"CSSStyleDeclaration-all-supported-properties-and-default-values.txt"
both here and in the following commit, we don't apply the (currently
empty) CSSStyleProperties prototype yet.
The spec defines several properties on the declaration which we
previously made virtual or stored on subclasses. This commit moves these
into CSSStyleDeclaration itself, and updates some of the naming.
This improves the output of `getComputedStyle()` for the `top`,
`bottom`, `left` and `right` properties, where the used value is now
returned rather than the computed value, where applicable."
Before this change, we only parsed fit-content as a standalone keyword,
but CSS-SIZING-3 added it as a function as well. I don't know of
anything else in CSS that is overloaded like this, so it ends up looking
a little awkward in the implementation.
Note that a lot of code had already been prepped for fit-content values
to have an argument, we just weren't parsing it.
This reduces the number of `.cpp` files that need to be recompiled when
one of the below header files changes as follows:
CSS/ComputedProperties.h: 1113 -> 49
CSS/ComputedValues.h: 1120 -> 209
Without this, getting a property's value from `element.style.foo` would
fail if `foo` is a shorthand property which has a longhand that is also
a shorthand. For example, `border` expands to `border-width` which
expands to `border-top-width`.
This is because we used `property()` to get a longhand's value, but this
returns nothing if the property is a shorthand.
This commit solves that by moving most of get_property_value() into a
separate method that returns a StyleProperty instead of a String, and
which calls itself recursively for shorthands. Also move the manual
shorthand construction out of ResolvedCSSStyleDeclaration so that all
CSSStyleDeclarations can use it.
The only ways this varies from the `scale()` function is with parsing
and serialization. Parsing stays separate, and serialization is done by
telling `TransformationStyleValue` which property it is, and overriding
its normal `to_string()` code for properties other than `transform`.
This reverts commit 76daba3069.
We're going to need separate types for the JS-exposed style values, so
it doesn't make sense for us to match their names with our internal
types.
C++ will jovially select the implicit conversion operator, even if it's
complete bogus, such as for unknown-size types or non-destructible
types. Therefore, all such conversions (which incur a copy) must
(unfortunately) be explicit so that non-copyable types continue to work.
NOTE: We make an exception for trivially copyable types, since they
are, well, trivially copyable.
Co-authored-by: kleines Filmröllchen <filmroellchen@serenityos.org>
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
The main motivation behind this is to remove JS specifics of the Realm
from the implementation of the Heap.
As a side effect of this change, this is a bit nicer to read than the
previous approach, and in my opinion, also makes it a little more clear
that this method is specific to a JavaScript Realm.
