This change adds the allowed angle range to the `font-style` property
definition. This allows these angles to be clamped after interpolation.
Ideally, the generator should be updated so that we can specify the
angle is in degrees. This would allow us to make use of this
information during parsing, which we can't do currently because we
don't know what the unit is. Using this value for interpolation
purposes is fine because the angle has been converted to its canonical
unit by this point.
We shouldn't include spread distance when serializing `text-shadow` as
it is not supported unlike `box-shadow` - to achieve this we store
whether this is a text or box shadow within the ShadowStyleValue and
serialize appropriately.
This introduces the `TextUnderlinePositionStyleValue` class, it is
possible to represent `text-underline-position` as a `StyleValueList`
but would have required ugly workarounds for either serialization or in
`ComputedProperties::text_underline_position`
Continues the work started in #5386 to simplify handling of positional
value list shorthand properties.
Previously we would parse these as `StyleValueList`s and then rely on
`StyleComputer::for_each_property_expanding_shorthands` to expand them
into longhands.
This required a bit of work to handle `ShorthandStyleValue`s for the
`@page` `margin` descriptor.
Previously we would instead parse these as single values and rely on
ad-hoc functionality in `for_each_property_expanding_shorthands` to
expand them to longhands.
This gets us a step closer to removing that ad-hoc functionality.
This behaviour should only apply to literal percentages as clarified
here: 4ee8429
We were also doing this wrong by converting the numeric type of the calc
to Length which was causing values to be defaulted to 1 instead (hence
the new passing tests for computed values as well)
...selector. Grammar per spec: `::slotted( <compound-selector> )`, so
we should reject selector as invalid if first compound selector is
followed by something else.
This change makes layout more correct on https://www.rottentomatoes.com/
This has always been a bit of a hack. Initially it made sense as a lot
of properties that accept a length also accept `auto`, but while
convenient, that leads to problems: It's easy to forget to check if a
length is `auto`, and places that don't accept it end up with an
invalid state lurking in the type system, which makes things unclear.
Not every user of this requires an `auto` state, but most do.
This has quite a big diff but most of that is mechanical:
LengthPercentageOrAuto has `resolved_or_auto()` instead of `resolved()`,
and `to_px_or_zero()` instead of `to_px()`, to make their output
clearer.
...instead of `auto` Lengths.
This also fixes interpolating between two `auto` `<bg-size>`s, which
fixes a lot of animation tests for both `background-size` and `mask`.
The spec is a bit awkward here: A few algorithms create an "empty"
SourceSet, and then assign its source-size value a few steps later, so
we have a temporary state with no length. In order to avoid complicating
the types with Optional, I've chosen to just assign it to 0px.
Previously we used `auto`, but `auto` is not a valid value here - it is
used inside the "parse a sizes attribute" algorithm, but that always
returns an actual length (or calc).
Reifying the result gets quite ad-hoc. Firstly because "parse a
component value" produces a ComponentValue, not a full StyleValue like
we need for math functions. And second, because not all math functions
can be reified as a CSSNumericValue:
Besides the fact that I haven't implemented CalculatedStyleValue
reification at all yet, there are a lot of math functions with no
corresponding CSSMathValue in the spec yet. If the calculation tree
contains any of those, the best we can do is reify as a CSSStyleValue,
and that isn't a valid return value from CSSNumericValue.parse(). So, I
made us throw a SyntaxError in those cases. This seems to match
Chrome's behaviour. Spec issue:
https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/1090
This reverts e7890429aa and partly reverts
a59c15481f.
The one pseudo-class that accepted multiple of these was :heading(), and
since that got changed to take integers instead, there's no need to keep
this extra complexity (and memory usage) around.
The CSSNumericType defined in the spec is a simple dictionary which is
only used for OM purposes. This NumericType class is used internally
and matches the more abstract definition of a "type".
This property provides a hint to the rendering engine about properties
that are likely to change in the near future, allowing for early
optimizations to be applied.
The upcoming `:heading()` pseudo-class takes multiple comma-separated
An+Bs. Also rename this field as the `:nth-[last-]child()`
pseudo-classes are only a subset of the users.
This currently only applies to property-level calculation contexts, more
work to be done to generate accepted ranges for other calculation
contexts (e.g. within transformation functions, color functions, etc)
CSSUnitValue is a typed-om type which we will implement separately in
the future. However, it still seems useful to give our dimension values
a base class. (Maybe they could be templated in the future?) So instead
of deleting it entirely, rename it to DimensionStyleValue and make its
API match our style better.
This reverts 0e3487b9ab.
Back when I made that change, I thought we could make our StyleValue
classes match the typed-om definitions directly. However, they have
different requirements. Typed-om types need to be mutable and GCed,
whereas StyleValues are immutable and ideally wouldn't require a JS VM.
While I was already making such a cataclysmic change, I've moved it into
the StyleValues directory, because it *not* being there has bothered me
for a long time. 😅
- Omit calcs that are resolved to `0px` from the serialized value
- Allow CSV to be the 'Z' component in interpolated value.
- Allow calcs with mixed percentages in the first two arguments.
To achieve the third item above the concept of a "special" value parsing
context has been added - this will also be useful for instance for
different arguments of color functions having different contexts.
Gains us 23 WPT tests
Technically, env() should not be an ASF. (😱) This is why some tests
still fail - env() as specced is expected to have its syntax checked
fully at parse-time, whereas ASFs are not properly syntax-checked until
later. However, I think this approach was worth doing for a few reasons:
- env() behaves like an ASF otherwise. (It is replaced with a set of
arbitrary component-values that are not known until computed-value
time.)
- env() was defined before the ASF concept existed, so I strongly
suspect it will be updated in the future to match that definition,
with a couple of adjustments. (eg, env() is allowed in some extra
places compared to var() and attr().)
- This was much quicker and easier to implement (under 3 hours in total)
compared to the greater amount of work to implement a whole separate
system just for env().
- Most of these tests are marked tentative, and the spec definition of
env() is still somewhat in flux, so failing some is not a huge deal.
If in the future I turn out to be wrong on this, we can convert it to
its own special thing.
This commit regresses a couple tests related to the mask shorthand
property. This is because we now parse the longhands but there are
errors related to serialization. Some of the failures are fixed again in
the next commit. However, for some animation tests this is not the case.
Those failures were simply masked by the fact that we did not parse the
property correctly.
