Attempting to set `HTMLInputElement.size` to 0 via IDL now throws an
IndexSizeError DOMException. Attempting to set it to a value larger
than 2147483647 results in it being set to the default value.
I dug through the code and the WebCryptoAPI spec to figure out the
reason for `... mixed case parameters` WPT tests and figured out that
our implementation was slightly wrong.
By being closer to the spec we can now pass those tests and also remove
a bunch of duplicated code.
Context: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/pull/2598#discussion_r1859263798
While the code that did this referred to the HTML spec, other browsers
appear not to have this behavior when parsing XML, and it breaks a WPT
subtest.
This change does not appear to break any tests, and fixes 1 WPT subtest.
Size negotiation should not occur for other viewports, such as iframe,
since that would allow content inside the iframe to affect the size of
the iframe in the containing document.
300 new subtest passes on WPT. :^)
If `HTMLMarqueeElemnt.scrollAmount` or `HTMLMarqueeElemnt.scrollDelay`
is set to a value larger than 2147483647, then it should be set to its
default value.
According to the HTML specification, the `size` attribute of an input
element must be a valid non-negative integer greater than zero. If the
value is invalid or set to `0`, the default size of `20` should be used.
This small change fixes one issue identified in
https://wpt.live/html/rendering/widgets/input-text-size.html
The WPT test suite was also automatically imported.
Use discrete animation when the number of components or the types
of corresponding components do not match. This commit does not cover
all cases, but adds FIXME comments in the appropriate places.
Previously any existing ElementInlineCSSStyleDeclaration would get
overwritten by e.setAttribute("style", ...), while it should be updated
instead.
This fixes 2 WPT subtests.
This change adds handling for the “Determine Child Nodes” substep at
https://w3c.github.io/accname/#comp_name_from_content_find_child in the
“Accessible Name and Description Computation” spec. Specifically, it
adds handling for the “If the current node has an attached shadow root”
and “if the current node is a slot with assigned nodes” conditions.
Otherwise, without this change, AT users don’t hear the expected
accessible names in cases where the content for which an accessible name
being computed is in a shadow root or slot element.
When serializing an sRGB color value that originated from a named color,
it should return the color name converted to ASCII lowercase. This
requires storing the color name (if it has one).
This change also requires explicitly removing the color names when
computing style, because computed color values do not retain their name.
It also requires removing a caching optimization in create_from_color(),
because adding the name means that the cached value might be wrong.
This fixes some WPT subtests, and also required updating some of our own
tests.
This change makes Ladybird correctly handle all “encapsulation” tests in
the https://wpt.fyi/results/accname/name/comp_host_language_label.html
set of tests in WPT.
Those all test the requirement that when computing the accessible name
for a <label>-ed form control, then any content (text content or
attribute values) from the control itself that would otherwise be
included in the accessible-name computation for it ancestor <label> must
instead be skipped and not included.
The HTML-AAM spec seems to try to achieve that result by expressing
specific steps for each particular type of form control. But what all
that reduces/optimizes/simplifies down to is just, “skip over self”.
Otherwise, without this change, Ladybird includes that “self” content
from those “encapsulated” elements when doing accessible-name
computation for the elements — which results in AT users hearing
unexpected extra content in the accessible names for those elements.
When inserting a new utf-16 surrogate next to an existing surrogate
with replaceData, the surrogates would not get merged correctly into a
single code point. This is because internally the text data is stored
as utf-8, and the two surrogates would be converted seperately. This
has now been fixed by first recreating the whole string in utf-16 and
then converting it back to utf-8.
It's not the most efficient solution, but this fixes at least 6 WPT
subtests.
This isn't directly in the spec, but since replaceChild is implemented
in terms of remove + insert, the removal step may cause arbitrary code
to execute, and so we have to verify that the replaceChild inputs still
make sense afterwards, before doing the insertion.
This roughly matches what WebKit does, and makes a bunch of HTML parsing
tests in WPT stop asserting.
