`StyleValue`s stored within `ComputedProperties` should be in their
computed forms, this is for various reasons including:
- Inheritance should be of computed values
- Animations should work on computed values
- Triggering transitions should work on computed values
Currently we store `StyleValue`s in an absolutized version of the
specified value - this is equivalent to the computed form in many cases
which is why this hasn't been causing significant issues but there are
some cases - such as `border-*-width` keywords where this is not the
case.
No functionality change as we are yet to implement any properties
The StyleValue stored in m_property_values is already in it's computed
form and it's trivial to pull the underlying value out so there is no
need to store this separately.
Also removes unnecessary handling of percentage values in
`absolutize_values` - this is already handled within `compute_font`.
And make it a DOM::Node, not DOM::Element. This makes everything flow
much better, such as spec texts that explicitly mention "focused area"
as the fact that we don't necessarily need to traverse a tree of
elements, since a Node can be focusable as well.
Eventually this will need to be a struct with a separate "focused area"
and "DOM anchor", but this change will make it easier to achieve that.
As `recompute_inherited_style` works in-place rather than building
ComputedProperties from scratch we need to keep track of which animated
properties are inherited to know whether we should remove them when we
have no more inherited value.
When a subtree is projected through a slot, its root now inherits style
from the slot's parent, rather than the parent of the unprojected root.
This fixes a ton of subtle issues, and is very noticeable on Reddit.
This was a misinterpretation of the spec; we should only indicate focus
if the form associated element supports keyboard input, for which
FormAssociatedTextControlElement is a much better match.
This reverts 0e3487b9ab.
Back when I made that change, I thought we could make our StyleValue
classes match the typed-om definitions directly. However, they have
different requirements. Typed-om types need to be mutable and GCed,
whereas StyleValues are immutable and ideally wouldn't require a JS VM.
While I was already making such a cataclysmic change, I've moved it into
the StyleValues directory, because it *not* being there has bothered me
for a long time. 😅
This has quite a lot of fall out. But the majority of it is just type or
UDL substitution, where the changes just fall through to other function
calls.
By changing property key storage to UTF-16, the main affected areas are:
* NativeFunction names must now be UTF-16
* Bytecode identifiers must now be UTF-16
* Module/binding names must now be UTF-16
Before this change, whenever element's attributes changed, we would add
a flag to "pending invalidation", indicating that all descendants whose
style uses CSS custom properties needed to be recomputed. This resulted
in severe overinvalidation, because we would run invalidation regardless
of whether any custom property on affected element actually changed.
This change takes another approach, and now we decide whether
descendant's style needs to be recomputed based on whether ancestor's
style recomputation results in a change of custom properties, though
this approach adds a little overhead to style computation as now we have
to compare old vs new hashmap of custom properties.
This brings substantial improvement on discord and x.com where, before
this change, advantage of using invalidation sets was lost and we had
to recompute all descendants, because almost all of them use custom
properties.
This porting effort makes it pretty clear we will want a UTF-16-aware
GenericLexer. But for now, we can actually make ASCII assumptions about
what we are parsing, and act accordingly.
`AnimationTimeline` visits pointers of all registered animations, so if
element is removed from DOM tree but its animations remain registered in
timeline, then `Animation` and owner `Element` will be kept alive until
`AnimationTimeline` is destroyed.
...and setter. We had lots of places where we check if pseudo-element
type is specified and then use `pseudo_element_computed_properties()` or
`computed_properties()`. This change moves these checks from caller side
to the getter and setter.
Whenever we end up with a scrollable overflow rect that goes beyond
either of its axes (i.e. the rect has a negative X or Y position
relative to its parent's absolute padding box position), we need to clip
that rect to prevent going into the "unreachable scrollable overflow".
This fixes the horizontal scrolling on https://ladybird.org (gets more
pronounced if you make the window very narrow).
This stops `::before` and `::after` nodes showing up for every single
element in the inspector tree. Unfortunately there's no way for us to
detect that one of these doesn't exist in layout but has *some* style
specified for it, but that seems like a rare use case.
Corresponds to dad91f49ef
The spec text doesn't actually require any changes from us, but I
noticed we were incorrectly calling `is_shadow_including_ancestor_of()`
instead of `is_shadow_including_inclusive_ancestor_of()`, so that's
fixed.
There are multiple things happening here which are interconnected:
- We now use AbstractElement to refer to the source of a counter, which
means we also need to pass that around to compute `content`.
- Give AbstractElement new helper methods that are needed by
CountersSet, so it doesn't have to care whether it's dealing with a
true Element or PseudoElement.
- The CountersSet algorithms now walk the layout tree instead of DOM
tree, so TreeBuilder needs to wait until the layout node exists
before it resolves counters for it.
- Resolve counters when creating a pseudo-element's layout node. We
awkwardly compute the `content` value up to twice: Once to figure out
what kind of node we need to make, and then if it's a string, we do
so again after counters are resolved so we can get the true value of
any `counter()` functions. This will need adjusting in the future but
it works for now.
This is one of those cases where the spec says "element" and
means "element or pseudo-element". The easiest way to handle both is to
make these be free functions that take an AbstractElement, and then
give AbstractElement some helper methods so that the caller doesn't
have to care which it's dealing with.
There are some FIXMEs here because PseudoElement doesn't have a
CountersSet yet, and because the CountersSet currently uses a
UniqueNodeID to identify counter sources, which doesn't support
pseudo-elements.
