We already have a check to skip the layout of descendants if the
available size is intrinsic, but this is not sufficient in nested
intrinsic layout cases, where the available size might be definite even
though we are in intrinsic layout mode.
This was an old hack intended to make percentage sizes on flex items
before we had implemented the appropriate special behavior of definite
sizes in flex layout.
Removing it makes flex layout less magical and should not change
behavior in any observable way.
The spec tells us to treat `auto` as `fit-content` when determining
flex item cross sizes, so let's just do *that* instead of awkwardly
doing an uncacheable nested layout of the item.
This was the only instance of `LayoutState` nesting outside of intrinsic
sizing, so removing it is an important step towards simplifying layout.
Turns out it was a lot easier than expected.
This was an old hack from before we understood how and when to resolve
percentages in flex layout. Removing it should not change anything,
but it does avoid a lot of redundant layout work on many pages.
This makes these values the same as `start` and `end`. While this is not
entirely correct, it is better than centering which is what we did
previously.
This fixes misaligned images on https://nos.nl
This commit introduces proper handling of three intrinsic size keywords
when used for CSS heights:
- min-content
- max-content
- fit-content
This necessitated a few plumbing changes, since we can't resolve these
values without having access to containing block widths.
This fixes some visual glitches on https://www.supabase.com/ as well
as a number of WPT tests. It also improves the appearance of dialogs.
compute_inset() was incorrectly retrieving the containing block size
because containing_block() is unaware of grid areas that form a
containing block for grid items but do not exist in the layout tree.
With this change, we explicitly pass the containing block into
compute_inset(), allowing it to correctly provide the containing block
sizes for grid items.
If available space is definite it should always match the size of the
containing block. Therefore, there is no need to do containing block
node lookup.
