InlinePaintable was an ad-hoc paintable type required to support the
fragmentation of inline nodes across multiple lines. It existed because
there was no way to associate multiple paintables with a single layout
node. This resulted in a lot of duplicated code between PaintableBox and
InlinePaintable. For example, most of the CSS properties like
background, border, shadows, etc. and hit-testing are almost identical
for both of them. However, the code had to be duplicated to account for
the fact that InlinePaintable creates a box for each line. And we had
quite many places that operate on paintables with a code like:
```
if (box.is_paintable_box()) {
// do something
} else (box.is_inline_paintable()) {
// do exactly the same as for paintable box but using InlinePaintable
}
```
This change replaces the usage of `InlinePaintable` with
`PaintableWithLines` created for each line, which is now possible
because we support having multiple paintables per layout node. By doing
that, we remove lots of duplicated code and bring our implementation
closer to the spec.
Selectors and at-rules both made assumptions about their indentation
level, which made it difficult to read the dump output. It'll become
even worse once rules can be further nested within each other, so let's
fix it now. :^)
Depending on usage, `@layer` has two forms, with two different CSSOM
types. One simply lists layer names and the other defines a layer with
its contained rules.
For a long time, we've used two terms, inconsistently:
- "Identifier" is a spec term, but refers to a sequence of alphanumeric
characters, which may or may not be a keyword. (Keywords are a
subset of all identifiers.)
- "ValueID" is entirely non-spec, and is directly called a "keyword" in
the CSS specs.
So to avoid confusion as much as possible, let's align with the spec
terminology. I've attempted to change variable names as well, but
obviously we use Keywords in a lot of places in LibWeb and so I may
have missed some.
One exception is that I've not renamed "valid-identifiers" in
Properties.json... I'd like to combine that and the "valid-types" array
together eventually, so there's no benefit to doing an extra rename
now.
And let the old shadow_root(), which was only supposed to be used by
bindings, be called shadow_root_for_bindings() instead.
This makes it much easier to read DOM code, and we don't have to worry
about when to use shadow_root_internal() or why.
This URL library ends up being a relatively fundamental base library of
the system, as LibCore depends on LibURL.
This change has two main benefits:
* Moving AK back more towards being an agnostic library that can
be used between the kernel and userspace. URL has never really fit
that description - and is not used in the kernel.
* URL _should_ depend on LibUnicode, as it needs punnycode support.
However, it's not really possible to do this inside of AK as it can't
depend on any external library. This change brings us a little closer
to being able to do that, but unfortunately we aren't there quite
yet, as the code generators depend on LibCore.
The paintable tree structure more closely matches the painting order
when fragments are owned by corresponding inline paintables. This
change does not affect the layout tree, as it is more convenient for
layout purposes to have all fragments owned by a block container in
one place.
Additionally, this improves performance significantly on pages with
many fragments, as we no longer have to walk the ancestor chain up
to the closest block container to determine if a fragment belongs
to an inline paintable.
This is a part of refactoring towards making the paintable tree
independent of the layout tree. Now, instead of transferring text
fragments from the layout tree to the paintable tree during the layout
commit phase, we allocate separate PaintableFragments that contain only
the information necessary for painting. Doing this also allows us to
get rid LineBoxes, as they are used only during layout.
No functional impact intended. This is just a more complicated way of
writing what we have now.
The goal of this commit is so that we are able to store the 'name' of a
pseudo element for use in serializing 'unknown -webkit-
pseudo-elements', see:
https://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-4/#compat
This is quite awkward, as in pretty much all cases just the selector
type enum is enough, but we will need to cache the name for serializing
these unknown selectors. I can't figure out any reason why we would need
this name anywhere else in the engine, so pretty much everywhere is
still just passing around this raw enum. But this change will allow us
to easily store the name inside of this new struct for when it is needed
for serialization, once those webkit unknown elements are supported by
our engine.
This commit removes DeprecatedString's "null" state, and replaces all
its users with one of the following:
- A normal, empty DeprecatedString
- Optional<DeprecatedString>
Note that null states of DeprecatedFlyString/StringView/etc are *not*
affected by this commit. However, DeprecatedString::empty() is now
considered equal to a null StringView.
Which pretty much needs to be done together due to the amount of places
where they are compared together.
This also involves porting over StackOfOpenElements over to FlyString
from DeprecatedFly string to prevent a gazillion calls to
`.to_deprecated_fly_string` calls in HTMLParser.
This should allow us to add a Element::attribute which returns an
Optional<String>. Eventually all callers should be ported to switch from
the DeprecatedString version, but in the meantime, this should allow us
to port some more IDL interfaces away from DeprecatedString.
Note that we don't load the local font as specified, but at least we no
longer reject such src properties in the CSS parser.
This makes the custom fonts used on http://apple.com/ actually load. :^)
