This change implements the requirements for the “suffering from an
overflow” and “suffering from an underflow” algorithms for
HTMLInputElement constraint validation.
This change fixes a bug in our implementation of the “step base”
algorithm at https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-input-min-zero. We
were using the “value” IDL/DOM attribute in a particular step, where the
spec instead actually requires using the “value” content attribute.
This change implements HTMLInputElement type=email constraint validation
in conformance with the current spec requirements (which happens to also
produce behavior that’s interoperable with other existing engines).
This change implements HTMLInputElement type=url constraint validation
in such a way as to match the behavior in other existing engines (which
is, however, very different from what the spec currently requires).
This change — part of the HTML constraint-validation API (aka
“client-side form validation”) — implements the willValidate IDL/DOM
attribute/property for all form controls that support it.
This reduces the number of `.cpp` files that need to be recompiled when
one of the below header files changes as follows:
CSS/ComputedProperties.h: 1113 -> 49
CSS/ComputedValues.h: 1120 -> 209
One point to note is that I am not entirely sure what the result
of the pre-existing valueAsNumber test should be for this strange
case which does not lie exactly on a week/day boundary. Chrome
gives a negative timestamp, which seems more wrong than the result
we give, and neither gecko or WebKit appear to support the 'week'
type. So I'm considering this result acceptable for now, and this
may be something that will need more WPT tests added in the future.
While keyword_to_foo() does return Optional<Foo>, in practice the
invalid keywords get rejected at parse-time, so we don't have to worry
about them here. This simplifies the user code quite a bit.
This matches the behavior of other browsers, which always set the dirty
checkedness flag when setting checkedness, except when setting the
`checked` content attribute.
Many times, attribute mutation doesn't necessitate a full style
invalidation on the element. However, the conditions are pretty
elaborate, so this first version has a lot of false positives.
We only need to invalidate style when any of these things apply:
1. The change may affect the match state of a selector somewhere.
2. The change may affect presentational hints applied to the element.
For (1) in this first version, we have a fixed list of attribute names
that may affect selectors. We also collect all names referenced by
attribute selectors anywhere in the document.
For (2), we add a new Element::is_presentational_hint() virtual that
tells us whether a given attribute name is a presentational hint.
This drastically reduces style work on many websites. As an example,
https://cnn.com/ is once again browseable.
Before this change, StyleComputer would essentially take a DOM element,
find all the CSS rules that apply to it, and resolve the computed value
for each CSS property for that element.
This worked great, but it meant we had to do all the work of selector
matching and cascading every time.
To enable new optimizations, this change introduces a break in the
middle of this process where we've produced a "CascadedProperties".
This object contains the result of the cascade, before we've begun
turning cascaded values into computed values.
The cascaded properties are now stored with each element, which will
later allow us to do partial updates without re-running the full
StyleComputer machine. This will be particularly valuable for
re-implementing CSS inheritance, which is extremely heavy today.
Note that CSS animations and CSS transitions operate entirely on the
computed values, even though the cascade order would have you believe
they happen earlier. I'm not confident we have the right architecture
for this, but that's a separate issue.
In conformance with the requirements of the spec PR at
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9546, this change adds support for
the “switch” attribute for type=checkbox “input” elements — which is
shipping in Safari (since Safari 17.4). This change also implements
support for exposing it to AT users with role=switch.
There are essentially 3 URL parsing AOs defined by the spec:
1. Parse a URL
2. Encoding parse a URL
3. Encoding parse a URL and serialize the result
Further, these are replicated between the Document and the ESO.
This patch defines these methods in accordance with the spec and updates
existing users to invoke the correct method. In places where the correct
method is ambiguous, we use the encoding parser to preserve existing ad-
hoc behavior.
The DOM spec defines what it means for an element to be an "editing
host", and the Editing spec does the same for the "editable" concept.
Replace our `Node::is_editable()` implementation with these
spec-compliant algorithms.
An editing host is an element that has the properties to make its
contents effectively editable. Editable elements are descendants of an
editing host. Concepts like the inheritable contenteditable attribute
are propagated through the editable algorithm.
