If we were calculating the static position for an absolutely positioned
inline box that resides in the last line of its containing block, we
would not have yet provided the fragments in that line with their
final positions. Additionally, we would always move the box beneath the
fragment, which was incorrect.
Fixes#5867.
Currently we're relying on LineBuilder's destructor to handle updating
the last line, if required. In order to fix an issue with our absolute
positioning code, we need to be able to update the last line earlier
than that. Remove the destructor and replace it with an explicit call to
LineBuilder::update_last_line().
No functional changes.
We now also store `outline-width` in ComputedValues as a `CSSPixels`
since we know it's an absolute length at `apply_style` time - this saves
us some work in converting to CSSPixels during layout.
Gains us 46 new passes since we now interpolate keywords (thick, thin,
etc) correctly.
Also loses us 4 WPT tests as we longer clamp negative values produced by
interpolation from the point of view of getComputedStyle (although the
'used' value is still clamped).
Gains us 112 new passes since we now interpolate keywords (thick, thin,
etc) correctly.
Also loses us 4 WPT tests as we longer clamp negative values produced by
interpolation from the point of view of getComputedStyle (although the
'used' value is still clamped).
Now elements with position `absolute` properly resolve their position
inside parent elements with `grid`. I also imported some WPT tests
related to that topic.
Part 2 of resolving issues on https://hack4krak.pl
All fragments inside an atomic inline box should stay within that box,
otherwise we'll screw up the paint order and paint them behind things
that they're supposed to be on top of.
This fixes an issue with inline-block content not appearing on sites
like Google Docs and Reddit, among others.
Fixes bug when we didn't use `tracks_to_grow_beyond_limits` and instead
distributed extra space to all affected tracks. Also implements missing
"when accommodating max-content" part.
We currently have a mixup in LibWeb between code unit offset and glyph
offset during hit testing. These extra fields will allow us to correct
this discrepency.
There are some nuances to creating these wrappers, such as manually
propagating certain text styles that are not inherited by default. We
already have the logic for this in
`NodeWithStyle::create_anonymous_wrapper()`, so reuse that method in our
implementation of the button layout.
Fixes applying certain text styles (such as `text-decoration`) to the
text of a `<button>`.
...by another GFC. When searching for grid item that contains an
abspos box positioned relative to GFC, it's incorrect to assume that the
closest ancestor box whose parent establishes GFC is always the one we
are looking for, because there may be non-positioned GFC in between.
Fixes regression introduced in 80c8e78.
If `will-change` is set to a property value where that property could
create a stacking context, then we create a stacking context regardless
of the current value of that property.
This property provides a hint to the rendering engine about properties
that are likely to change in the near future, allowing for early
optimizations to be applied.
Previously, it was possible for an up/down arrow press to place the
cursor in the middle of a multi-code point grapheme cluster. We want to
prevent this in a way that matches the behavior of other browsers.
Both Chrome and Firefox will map the starting position to a visually
equivalent position in the target line with harfbuzz and ICU segmenters.
The need for this is explained in a code comment. The result is a much
more natural feeling of text navigation.
For button layouts, we were overriding the computed `width` value with
`fit-content` in `TreeBuilder::wrap_in_button_layout_if_needed()`. But
the spec asks us to set the _used value_ instead, so we now actually
calculate the fit-content width and set the box' content width to it.
Fixes#2516.
This suits the spec a bit better, and exposes the fact that we were
allowing `::ImageButton` to use the button layout although it is never
specified that it should do so. Tests were rebaselined for this.
We should calculate whether we need to truncate text with an ellipsis
exclusive of any trailing collapsible whitespace.
This was causing issues where an inline element was automatically sized
(e.g. min-content) as we would calculate available width exclusive of
trailing collapsible whitespace and then our text chunk would be wider,
always inserting an ellipsis.
Fixes the visual element of #4048 but we still are incorrect in how we
collapse whitespace more generally
Before this change, `layout_absolutely_positioned_element()` in GFC
had an assumption that all contained by grid container abspos boxes were
also direct children of the grid container. This change adds handling
for the cases when it's not true and, in order to identify grid area
abspos box belongs to, we have to find ancestor grid item.
When a table row (or its group) is set to collapse, the row takes up no
vertical space in the layout.
We have to account for this in multiple places, so I've cached whether a
row is collapsed in the TableGrid::Row.
CSS grid specification states that for grid items with a replaced
element and a percentage preferred size or maximum size, the percentage
should be resolved against 0 during content-based minimum size
calculation. This makes sense, as it prevents replaced items from
overshooting their grid track while intrinsic track sizes are
calculated, and allows later track size resolution steps to scale
replaced items to fit their grid track.
This reverts 0e3487b9ab.
Back when I made that change, I thought we could make our StyleValue
classes match the typed-om definitions directly. However, they have
different requirements. Typed-om types need to be mutable and GCed,
whereas StyleValues are immutable and ideally wouldn't require a JS VM.
While I was already making such a cataclysmic change, I've moved it into
the StyleValues directory, because it *not* being there has bothered me
for a long time. 😅
FFC expects parent formatting context to mark size as definite if that's
the case, because otherwise it cannot figure cross line size correctly.
Fixes incorrect alignment when FFC is nested in GFC.
Progress on https://web.telegram.org/a/ layout.
These will be used for the mask-repeat property as well in an upcoming
commit, hence the more generic names. Also, this more closely matches
the names used in the spec.
As it turns out, we still have to let the formatting contexts do a bit
of layout work in order to correctly apply the aspect-ratio. Hence we
can't just implicitly transfer definiteness from one size to the other.
This is a revert of 1cfd8b3ac0.
Fixes crash in the created test as well as https://wpt.live/css/css-text
/word-spacing/reference/word-spacing-percent-001-ref.html. The WPT test
hasn't been imported as it passing is currently a false-positive due to
the fact that we don't yet respect `word-spacing` in most cases.
Taking a ColorResolutionContext directly instead of creating one from a
layout node allows us to call this from places where we don't have a
layout node.
Using a generic context argument will allow us to resolve colors in
places where we have all the required information but not in the form of
a layout node as was expected previously.
Applicable FCs with an indefinite width simply shrink in their available
space as long as floats are intruding, but as soon as we have a definite
width we must push the box down until it it has enough space again.
Fixes#4136.
PaintContext dates back to a time when display lists didn't exist and it
truly represented "paint context". Renaming it to better align with its
current role.
Before committing a new layout (and thus building a new paint tree)
we now go through both the old paint tree and the layout tree and detach
them from each other.
This is a little extra work, but it ensures that there are no lingering
references across the trees, which we were apparently accumulating in
some cases on Discord, causing GC leaks.
