We previously had PropertyOwningCSSStyleDeclaration and
ResolvedCSSStyleDeclaration, representing the current style properties
and resolved style respectively. Both of these were the
CSSStyleDeclaration type in the CSSOM. (We also had
ElementInlineCSSStyleDeclaration but I removed that in a previous
commit.)
In the meantime, the spec has changed so that these should now be a new
CSSStyleProperties type in the CSSOM. Also, we need to subclass
CSSStyleDeclaration for things like CSSFontFaceRule's list of
descriptors, which means it wouldn't hold style properties.
So, this commit does the fairly messy work of combining these two types
into a new CSSStyleProperties class. A lot of what previously was done
as separate methods in the two classes, now follows the spec steps of
"if the readonly flag is set, do X" instead, which is hopefully easier
to follow too.
There is still some functionality in CSSStyleDeclaration that belongs in
CSSStyleProperties, but I'll do that next. To avoid a huge diff for
"CSSStyleDeclaration-all-supported-properties-and-default-values.txt"
both here and in the following commit, we don't apply the (currently
empty) CSSStyleProperties prototype yet.
This is not really a context, but more of a set of parameters for
creating a Parser. So, treat it as such: Rename it to ParsingParams,
and store its values and methods directly in the Parser instead of
keeping the ParsingContext around.
This has a nice side-effect of not including DOM/Document.h everywhere
that needs a Parser.
This file has been a pain to edit for a while, even with the previous
splits. So, I've divided it up into 3 parts:
- Parser.cpp has the "base" code. It's the algorithms and entry-points
defined in the Syntax spec.
- ValueParsing.cpp contains code for parsing single values, such as a
length, or a color, or a calculation.
- PropertyParsing.cpp contains code for parsing an entire property's
value. A few of these sit in a grey area between being a property's
value and a value in their own right, but the rule I've used is "is
this useful outside of a single property and its shorthands?"
This only moves code, with as few modifications as possible to make that
work. I did add explicit instantiations for the template implementations
as part of this, which revealed a few that are actually only compatible
with a single type, so I'll clear those up in a subsequent commit.
Same again, although rotation is more complicated: `rotate`
is "equivalent to" multiple different transform function depending on
its arguments. So we can parse as one of those instead of the full
`rotate3d()`, but then need to handle this when serializing.
This reverts commit 76daba3069.
We're going to need separate types for the JS-exposed style values, so
it doesn't make sense for us to match their names with our internal
types.
This is an attempt to bring the size of Parser.cpp down. No code
changes, just moves and some explicit template instantiations now that
we're using them from a different file.
This is really bare bone as we only support the `xyz-d50` color space
for the moment.
It makes us pass the following WPT tests:
- css/css-color/predefined-016.html
- css/css-color/xyz-d50-001.html
- css/css-color/xyz-d50-002.html
CSS Syntax 3 (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-syntax) has changed
significantly since we implemented it a couple of years ago. Just about
every parsing algorithm has been rewritten in terms of the new token
stream concept, and to support nested styles. As all of those
algorithms call into each other, this is an unfortunately chonky diff.
As part of this, the transitory types (Declaration, Function, AtRule...)
have been rewritten. That's both because we have new requirements of
what they should be and contain, and also because the spec asks us to
create and then gradually modify them in place, which is easier if they
are plain structs.
Depending on usage, `@layer` has two forms, with two different CSSOM
types. One simply lists layer names and the other defines a layer with
its contained rules.
Instead of CSSColorValue holding a Gfx::Color, make it an abstract class
with subclasses for each different color function, to match the Typed-OM
spec. This means moving the color calculations from the parsing code to
the `to_color()` method on the style value.
This lets us have calc() inside a color function, instead of having to
fully resolve the color at parse time. The canvas fillStyle tests have
been updated to reflect this.
The other test change is Screenshot/css-color-functions.html: previously
we produced slightly different colors for an alpha of 0.5 and one of
50%, and this incorrect behavior was baked into the test. So now it's
more correct. :^)
This adds a motion preference to the browser UI similar to the existing
ones for color scheme and contrast.
Both AppKit UI and Qt UI has this new preference.
The auto value is currently the same as NoPreference, follow-ups can
address wiring that up to the actual preference for the OS.
