We don't yet have a system for "legacy value aliases", but until we have
a lot of them we can handle them manually.
We also have to do this in two places because
parse_css_value_for_property() doesn't call any property-specific
parsing code.
With this, we pass the 8 ref tests in css/selectors/selectors-4/ which
previously failed. This is not technically a full implementation, as we
are supposed to first canonicalize the language range and tag, but that
will require downloading and processing the IANA language subtag
registry:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry
That's significantly more work, and WPT doesn't seem to test any cases
that require that, so we can leave it for now.
The contain-paint-stacking-context-001a.html test has been removed
for now because it has a 1px tall blue line at the top that should
not be there. With paint containment, this line is removed only in
the actual test case, but not in the reference. This is because of
the font that we use in testing and happens in Chromium as well if
the test is run with that font.
Previously, the `|=` would not compare strings containing `-`
characters correctly because it would only compare the element
attribute up to the first `-` character.
This is a improved version of a73cd88f0c
The old commit was reverted in 552dd18696
The new version only paints an element into a new layer if background
blend modes other than normal are used. The rasterization performance
of most websites should therefore not suffer.
Co-Authored-By: Alexander Kalenik <kalenik.aliaksandr@gmail.com>
This reverts commit a73cd88f0c.
Emitting SaveLayer for each paintable made rasterization a lot slower
on every website because now Skia has to allocate enormous amounts of
temporary surfaces. Let's revert it for now and figure how to implement
it with less aggressive SaveLayer usage.
Quite simply, ignore any declarations for properties we don't want,
while computing a pseudo-element's style.
I've imported a WPT test for this, which fails without this patch.
positioned element is a descendant of inline-block
Sets inline block offsets in InlineFormattingContext.cpp, but this is
not enough. When static position rect is calculated during layout,
not all ancestors of abspos box may have their offsets calculated yet
(more info here: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/pull/2583#issuecomment-2507140272).
So now static position rect is calculated relative to static containing
block during layout and calculation relative to actual containing block
is done later in
FormattingContext::layout_absolutely_positioned_element.
Fixes wpt/css/CSS2/abspos/static-inside-inline-block.html
A couple of fixes here:
- Parse a `<complex-selector>` instead of a `<selector-list>`
- Don't match if any unknown `::-webkit-*` pseudo-elements are found
Instead of trying to manually determine which parts of a bitmap fall
within the box of the `<img>` element, just draw the whole bitmap and
let Skia clip the draw-area to the correct rectangle.
This fixes a bug where the entire bitmap was squashed into the rectangle
of the image box instead of being clipped.
With this change, image rendering is now correct enough to import some
of the WPT tests for object-fit and object-position. To get some good
coverage I have imported all tests for the `<img>` tag. I also wanted to
import a subset of the tests for the `<object>` tag, since those are
passing as well now. Unfortunately, they are flaky for unknown reasons.
This is the second attempt at this bugfix. The prior one was e055927ead
and broke image rendering whenever the page was scrolled. It has
subsequently been reverted in 16b14273d1. Hopefully this time it is not
horribly broken.
Instead of trying to manually determine which parts of a bitmap fall
within the box of the `<img>` element, just draw the whole bitmap and
let Skia clip the draw-area to the correct rectangle.
This fixes a bug where the entire bitmap was squashed into the rectangle
of the image box instead of being clipped.
With this change, image rendering is now correct enough to import some
of the WPT tests for object-fit and object-position. To get some good
coverage I have imported all tests for the `<img>` tag. I also wanted to
import a subset of the tests for the `<object>` tag, since those are
passing as well now. Unfortunately, they are flaky for unknown reasons.
Before this change, we were always processing all row groups first,
and then all rows. This led to incorrect table layouts when rows and row
groups were encountered in anything but that order.
This fixes an issue where `vertical-align: middle` would incorrectly
shift the text away from the natural alphabetic baseline.
Fixing this makes many WPT table tests work correctly, so I'm also
importing one of them here. :^)
We've long claimed to support this, but then silently ignored string
values, until 4cb2063577 which would
not-so-silently crash instead. (Oops)
So, actually pass the string value along and use it in the list marker.
As part of this, rename our `list-style-type` enum to
`counter-style-name-keyword`. This is an awkward name, attempting to be
spec-based. (The spec says `<counter-style>`, which is either a
`<counter-style-name>` or a function, and the `<counter-style-name>` is
a `<custom-ident>` that also has a few predefined values. So this is the
best I could come up with.)
Unfortunately only one WPT test for this passes - the others fail
because we produce a different layout when text is in `::before` than
when it's in `::marker`, and similar issues.
The Web::CSS::Parser's GradientParsing ignores color-stops if
it is only a single one. This change allows to have color-stops
with double positions against a single color.
Further, also allows for `linear-gradient(black)` and similar
other gradient functions
For all invalidation properties nested into nth-child argument list we
need to invalidate whole subtree to make sure style of sibling elements
will be recalculated.
When an element is displayed as table, an anonymous table wrapper box
needs to be created for it. Among others, the position property of the
table element is then applied to the anonymous table wrapper box
instead. If the table happens to be positioned absolutely, the table
wrapper box may become the containing block for absolutely positioned
elements inside the table.
In the original code however, anonymous layout nodes were excluded from
becoming the containing block for an absolutely positioned element.
Because of this, the containing block was calculated to be the first
suitable parent block of the table wrapper box.
This incorrect containing block would result in a crash later on when
trying to size the absolutely positioned element inside the table. To
prevent this crash, the anonymous table wrapper box is now allowed to
become the containing block for absolutely positioned elements inside
a table.
The definition of containing block for an absolutely positioned element
in the spec does not mention anything about skipping anonymous boxes.
Additionally the rules for absolute positioning of tables
(https://www.w3.org/TR/css-tables-3/#abspos-boxes-in-table-root) imply
that a table wrapper box is indeed able to be the containing block for
absolutely positioned elements.
