This change fixes a bug in our implementation of the “step base”
algorithm at https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-input-min-zero. We
were using the “value” IDL/DOM attribute in a particular step, where the
spec instead actually requires using the “value” content attribute.
This change implements HTMLInputElement type=email constraint validation
in conformance with the current spec requirements (which happens to also
produce behavior that’s interoperable with other existing engines).
This change implements HTMLInputElement type=url constraint validation
in such a way as to match the behavior in other existing engines (which
is, however, very different from what the spec currently requires).
The `cursor` property accepts a list of possible cursors, which behave
as a fallback: We use whichever cursor is the first available one. This
is a little complicated because initially, any remote images have not
loaded, so we need to use the fallback standard cursor, and then switch
to another when it loads.
So, ComputedValues stores a Vector of cursors, and then in EventHandler
we scan down that list until we find a cursor that's ready for use.
The spec defines cursors as being `<url>`, but allows for `<image>`
instead. That includes functions like `linear-gradient()`.
This commit implements image cursors in the Qt UI, but not AppKit.
This gets us 37 new subtest passes in css/css-values, and 13 passes in
our other in-tree tests (and probably some random other ones!)
As noted in comments, a few parts of this algorithm have ad-hoc
behaviour to handle some issues in the spec.
Before this change, we only parsed fit-content as a standalone keyword,
but CSS-SIZING-3 added it as a function as well. I don't know of
anything else in CSS that is overloaded like this, so it ends up looking
a little awkward in the implementation.
Note that a lot of code had already been prepped for fit-content values
to have an argument, we just weren't parsing it.
This change — part of the HTML constraint-validation API (aka
“client-side form validation”) — implements the willValidate IDL/DOM
attribute/property for all form controls that support it.
One point to note is that I am not entirely sure what the result
of the pre-existing valueAsNumber test should be for this strange
case which does not lie exactly on a week/day boundary. Chrome
gives a negative timestamp, which seems more wrong than the result
we give, and neither gecko or WebKit appear to support the 'week'
type. So I'm considering this result acceptable for now, and this
may be something that will need more WPT tests added in the future.
Corresponds to part of https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9841 and then
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/11047
Adding `Auto` as a type state feels a little odd, as it's not an actual
type allowed in HTML. However, it's the default state when the value is
missing or invalid, which works out the same, as long as we never
serialize "auto", which we don't.
Regressed in 036327332f.
This commit moves the optimization a little later in replaceData(),
still avoiding relayout (the important part).
Recovers 480 points on WPT. :^)
There's a quirk in HTML where the parser should ignore any line feed
character immediately following a `pre` or `textarea` start tag.
This was working fine when we could peek ahead in the input stream and
see the next token, but didn't work in character-at-a-time parsing with
document.write().
This commit adds the "can ignore next line feed character" as a parser
flag that is maintained across invocations, making it work in this
parsing mode as well.
20 new passes in WPT/html/syntax/parsing/ :^)
Instead of always inserting a new text node, we now continue appending
to an extisting text node if the parser's character insertion point is
a suitable text node.
This fixes an issue where multiple invocations of document.write() would
create unnecessary sequences of text nodes. Such sequences are now
merged automatically.
19 new passes in WPT/html/syntax/parsing/ :^)
We were neglecting to return after handling the `frameset` start tag,
which caused us to process it twice, once properly and once generically.
54 new passes in WPT/html/syntax/parsing/ :^)
Before this change, the explicit EOF inserted by document.close() would
instantly abort the parser. This meant that parsing algorithms that ran
as part of the parser unwinding on EOF would never actually run.
591 new passes in WPT/html/syntax/parsing/ :^)
This exposed a problem where the parser would try to insert a root
<html> element on EOF in a document where someone already inserted such
an element via direct DOM manipulation. The parser now gracefully
handles this scenario. It's covered by existing tests (which would
crash without this change.)
