Namely:
- Perform case-insensitive matching
- Return the same extension objects every time
- Only enable the extension if it's supported by the current context
Same again, although rotation is more complicated: `rotate`
is "equivalent to" multiple different transform function depending on
its arguments. So we can parse as one of those instead of the full
`rotate3d()`, but then need to handle this when serializing.
The only ways this varies from the `scale()` function is with parsing
and serialization. Parsing stays separate, and serialization is done by
telling `TransformationStyleValue` which property it is, and overriding
its normal `to_string()` code for properties other than `transform`.
This makes it more convenient to use the 'relvant agent' concept,
instead of the awkward dynamic casts we needed to do for every call
site.
mutation_observers is also changed to hold a GC::Root instead of raw
GC::Ptr. Somehow this was not causing problems before, but trips up CI
after these changes.
Instead of storing all storage objects in static memory, we now
follow the the spec by lazily creating a unique Storage object
on each document object.
Each Storage object now holds a 'proxy' to the underlying backing
storage. For now, this proxy is simply a reference to the backing
object. In the future, it will need to be some type of interface
object that stores on a SQLite database or similar.
Session storage is now correctly stored / tracked as part of the
TraversableNavigable object.
Local storage is still stored in a static map, but eventually this
should be factored into something that is stored at the user agent
level.
This reverts commit 76daba3069.
We're going to need separate types for the JS-exposed style values, so
it doesn't make sense for us to match their names with our internal
types.
The popoverTargetElement seems to be one of the only cases of a
reflected Element? attribute in the HTML spec, the behaviour of which
is specified in section 2.6.1.
Buttons can't actually toggle popovers yet because showing/hiding
popovers is not implemented yet.
This is definitely not 100% correct but I tried implementing the basic
algorithms described in CSS 2.2. It's good enough to render the penguin
on @linusg's homepage at the right size. :^)
Instead of invoking the CSS parser every time we compute the style for
an element that has a "style" attribute, we now cache the result of
parsing the inline style whenever the "style" attribute is set.
This is a nice boost to relayout performance since we no longer hit the
CSS parser at all.
Bring the names of various boxes closer to spec language. This should
hopefully make things easier to understand and hack on. :^)
Some notable changes:
- LayoutNode -> Layout::Node
- LayoutBox -> Layout::Box
- LayoutBlock -> Layout::BlockBox
- LayoutReplaced -> Layout::ReplacedBox
- LayoutDocument -> Layout::InitialContainingBlockBox
- LayoutText -> Layout::TextNode
- LayoutInline -> Layout::InlineNode
Note that this is not strictly a "box tree" as we also hang inline/text
nodes in the same tree, and they don't generate boxes. (Instead, they
contribute line box fragments to their containing block!)
This is a first (huge) step towards modernizing the layout architecture
and bringing it closer to spec language.
Layout is now performed by a stack of formatting contexts, operating on
the box tree (or layout tree, if you will.)
There are currently three types of formatting context:
- BlockFormattingContext (BFC)
- InlineFormattingContext (IFC)
- TableFormattingContext (TFC)
Document::layout() creates the initial BlockFormattingContext (BFC)
which lays out the initial containing block (ICB), and then we recurse
through the tree, creating BFC, IFC or TFC as appropriate and handing
over control at the context boundaries.
The majority of this patch is just refactoring the old logic spread out
in LayoutBlock and LayoutTableRowGroup, and turning into these context
classes instead. A lot more cleanup will be needed.
There are many architectural wins here, the main one being that layout
is no longer performed by boxes themselves, which gives us much greater
flexibility in the outer/inner layout of a given box.
