To be properly compatible with calc(), the resolved() methods all need:
- A length resolution context
- To return an Optional, as the calculation might not be resolvable
A bonus of this is that we can get rid of the overloads of `resolved()`
as they now all behave the same way.
A downside is a scattering of `value_or()` wherever these are used. It
might be the case that all unresolvable calculations have been rejected
before this point, but I'm not confident, and so I'll leave it like
this for now.
Initially I added this to the existing CalculationContext, but in
reality, we have some data at parse-time and different data at
resolve-time, so it made more sense to keep those separate.
Instead of needing a variety of methods for resolving a Foo, depending
on whether we have a Layout::Node available, or a percentage basis, or
a length resolution context... put those in a
CalculationResolutionContext, and just pass that one thing to these
methods. This also removes the need for separate resolve_*_percentage()
methods, because we can just pass the percentage basis in to the regular
resolve_foo() method.
This also corrects the issue that *any* calculation may need to resolve
lengths, but we previously only passed a length resolution context to
specific types in some situations. Now, they can all have one available,
though it's up to the caller to provide it.
This reverts commit 76daba3069.
We're going to need separate types for the JS-exposed style values, so
it doesn't make sense for us to match their names with our internal
types.
The length resolution context might be needed even when resolving an
integer value, since it might contain a sign() function with length
values inside. This fixes a WPT subtest.
