This represents a property value that hasn't been converted to a
"proper" StyleValue yet. That is, it's either a custom property's value,
or a value that includes `var()` references, (or both!) since neither of
those can be fully resolved at parse time.
This now outputs valid CSS representing the background, instead of
confusing debug info.
We can't guarantee that all the longhands have the same number of
values, since while that's always the case when parsing, we also create
BackgroundStyleValues when producing the resolved style, which just
combines the longhands together.
There's nothing really background-size-specific about this, but since
there is no `<size>` value type defined in the CSS spec at this time,
and background-size is the only user of it, I think this name makes more
sense. But I'm not 100% convinced.
...as opposed to storing StyleValues, which we have to later check are
IdentifierStyleValues, which store identifiers that we can convert to
Repeat values later. It's fewer allocations, and we can't end up with
invalid values by mistake. :^)
This is step 1 in removing the two `background-repeat-x/y`
pseudo-properties. Since adding the concept of compound StyleValues, we
don't need `background-repeat` to be split in two any more.
This is done a bit differently from other properties: using a
TokenStream instead of just a Vector of ComponentValues. The reason for
this is, we can then use call the same function when parsing the
`background` shorthand. Otherwise, we would have to know in advance how
many values to pass down, which basically would involve duplicating the
`background-position` parsing code inside `background`.
The StyleValue is PositionStyleValue, since it represents a
`<position>`: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#typedef-position
Unfortunately, background-position's parsing is a bit different from
`<position>`'s, (background-position allows 3-value syntax and
`<position>` doesn't) so we'll need to come back and write a different
parsing function for that later.
This always felt awkward to me, and required a few other hacks to make
it work. Now, the request is only started when `load_bitmap()` is
called, which we do inside `NodeWithStyle::apply_style()`.
Until now, we've internally thought of the CSS "display" property as a
single-value property. In practice, "display" is a much more complex
property that comes in a number of configurations.
The most interesting one is the two-part format that describes the
outside and inside behavior of a box. Switching our own internal
representation towards this model will allow for much cleaner
abstractions around layout and the various formatting contexts.
Note that we don't *parse* two-part "display" yet, this is only about
changing the internal representation of the property.
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display
When parsing a CSS value in the context of a CSSStyleDeclaration
camelCase property setter, we don't necessarily have a Document to
provide the CSS parser for context.
So the parser can't go assuming that there's always a Document in the
ParsingContext. And ImageStyleValue can't go assuming that there's
always a Document either. This will require some more work to get things
right, I'm just patching up the null dereference for now.
This does a few things, that are hard to separate. For a while now, it's
been confuzing what `StyleValue::is_foo()` actually means. It sometimes
was used to check the type, and sometimes to see if it could return a
certain value type. The new naming scheme is:
- `is_length()` - is it a LengthStyleValue?
- `as_length()` - casts it to LengthStyleValue
- `has_length()` - can it return a Length?
- `to_length()` - gets the internal value out (eg, Length)
This also means, no more `static_cast<LengthStyleValue const&>(*this)`
stuff when dealing with StyleValues. :^)
Hopefully this will be a bit clearer going forward. There are lots of
places using the original methods, so I'll be going through them to
hopefully catch any issues.
Calling `is_identifier()` here was wrong, since it just means you can
get an Identifier from it. This meant that an `auto` LengthStyleValue
would return true, then it would get `static_cast` to the wrong class,
and return a garbage value.
Basically, I really need to tidy up the API for StyleValue, so it's
clear whether `is_foo()` means the object is a `FooStyleValue`, or it
can just return a `foo` value.
For `number` and `integer` types, you can add a range afterwards to add
a range check, using similar syntax to that used in the CSS specs. For
example:
```json
"font-weight": {
...
"valid-types": [
"number [1,1000]"
],
...
}
```
This limits any numbers to the range `1 <= n <= 1000`.
This namespace will be used for all interfaces defined in the URL
specification, like URL and URLSearchParams.
This has the unfortunate side-effect of requiring us to use the fully
qualified AK::URL name whenever we want to refer to the AK class, so
this commit also fixes all such references.
Previously it was returning an "auto" length. This caused all the new
"initial" values to effectively turn into auto values long before layout
had a chance to resolve them.
This broke replaced elements with intrinsic size but no specified width
or height, and is the reason that Mr. ACID2 temporarily lost his eyes.
Apart from now gathering comma-separated font-family names into a
StyleValueList, this also corrects the logic for parsing a single
font-family. Previously, we did not handle unquoted font names at all,
and now they are handled including when they are several words separated
by whitespace.
Modified the logic for `font` to use `parse_font_family_value()`.
`FontStyleValue.font_families()` is now a StyleValueList instead of a
vector, so that it can be better handled in StyleResolver.
We also finally remove the CSS::ParsingContext in
set_property_expanding_shorthands(). :^)
This wraps an x and y background-repeat value. Potentially, we could use
this in place of the background-repeat-x and background-repeat-y
pseudo-properties, but for now StyleResolver splits it into those
properties, like it did before.
This parses the elliptical border-radius values, though currently we
only support circular ones. So, to_length() is overloaded to return the
horizontal-radius. This means the code in Layout/Node.cpp does not need
to change for now.
This is not just moving the code from StyleResolver to Parser. The logic
has changed to allow for the `flex-basis` to come before or after the
`flex-grow/shrink` values, as well as handle the special one-value
cases.
Also added test cases to flex.html to check the parsing. It does parse
correctly, but elements with `flex-basis: auto` do not calculate their
width correctly.
