Year computation has to be based on seconds, not days, in case
t is < 0 but t / __seconds_per_day is 0.
Year computation also has to consider negative timestamps.
With this, days is always positive and <= the number of days in the
year, so base the tm_wday computation directly on the timestamp,
and do it first, before t is modified in the year computation.
In C, % can return a negative number if the left operand is negative,
compensate for that.
Tested via test-js. (Except for tm_wday, since we don't implement
Date.prototype.getUTCDate() yet.)