I haven't found this being mentioned in the current spec, but that is
what chromium (atm the only other Navigation API implementer) does.
Fixes crashing when location.hash is changed subsequently more than once
using JS.
Fixes bug when "navigate forward" button in UI is disabled after
performing following steps:
1. Load page with an iframe (top step = 0, iframe step = 0)
2. Navigate iframe to different document (top step = 0, iframe step = 1)
3. Navigate back from browser UI (top step = 0, iframe step = 0)
No test because change is only observable from browser UI.
Previously, the parent CSS stylesheet, owner node and owner CSS rule
properties were not unset when removing a sheet from a StyleSheetList.
This change moves the methods for adding and removing sheets to and
from a StyleSheetList, directly into the StyleSheetList class and
ensures they are called as required by the CSSOM specification.
This step assumes copyURL is modified in place, while
`URL::Parser::basic_parse()` returns it as a result.
> 6. Basic URL parse input, with copyURL as url and fragment state as
state override.
So copyURL has to be reassigned to navigate to new url on step 8:
> 8. Location-object navigate this to copyURL.
This changes the signature of queue_a_microtask() from AK:Function to
JS::HeapFunction to be more clear to the user of the functions that this
is what is used internally.
The previous name was extremely misleading, because the call is used for
pushing or replacing new session history entry on chrome side instead of
only changing URL.
It is going to be used to communicate whether it is possible to navigate
back or forward after session history stored on browser side will no
longer be used to driver navigation.
This change adds the `captureEvents()` and `releaseEvents()` methods to
the window object. These methods are obsolete, but are still included
in the HTML specification, which says they must do nothing.
See spec issue https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/9869
Previous attempt on fixing reload had to be reverted because it broke
Soundcloud and GitHub, but this change does not seem to introduce new
crashes.
This reverts commit 664611bae4.
It seems like the HTML spec has been misinterpreted and this text:
"... Note that in this setup, the processing model still enforces that
the user agent would never process events from any one task source out
of order."
does not mean we can't interrupt execution of task by a task with the
same task source. It just says they should be processed in the order
they were added.
Fixes hanging while navigating from PR list to PR page on GitHub.
Rather than each element which supports dimension attributes needing to
implement parsing the attributes and setting the appropriate style, we
can generalize this functionality. This will also make each element more
closely resemble the spec text, as we will be effectively declaring, for
example, "The img element supports dimension attributes" in code.
Before this change JS console was initialise from
activate_history_entry() which is too late for about:blank documents
that are ready to run scripts immediately after creation.
"apply the history step" initiated by reloading or back/forward
navigation might require doing fetching while populating a document,
so it is not possible to restrict spin_until() to process only
NavigationAndTraversal task source.
"apply the history step" initiated by synchronous navigation keeps
processing only NavigationAndTraversal task source because it will
never have to populate a document. Another reason to keep synchronous
navigation blocking other task sources is that we crash if active SHE
changes in the middle of "apply the history step" initiated by sync
navigation. The new test is added to makes sure we don't regress that.
From HTML spec https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#definitions-3
"... Note that in this setup, the processing model still enforces that
the user agent would never process events from any one task source out
of order."
I can't come up with an example that is fixed by this change. However,
debugging a bug caused by violating this assumption from the spec is
likely to be very painful.
This piggybacks on the same fragment serialization code that innerHTML
uses, but instead of constructing an imaginary parent element like the
spec asks us to, we just add a separate serialization mode that includes
the context element in the serialized markup.
This makes the image carousel on https://utah.edu/ show up :^)
This fixes the relevant warnings when running LibJSGCVerifier. Note that
the analysis is only performed over LibJS-adjacent code, but could be
performed over the entire codebase. That will have to wait for a future
commit.
