Previously if we would overwrite the non-animated font-size with the
animated font-size if it was set.
Loses us 2 WPT tests but this is in line with other browsers
We now also more closely follow the spec when computing values for
font-weight and we now:
- Support relative lengths in `calc()`s
- Properly clamp `calc()`s
- Support relative keywords (e.g. lighter, bolder)
- Respect that font-weight can be a non-integer number.
This does expose a few false positives in the font-weight-computed.html
WPT test. This is because we don't recompute non-inherited font-weight
within `recompute_inherited_style` which means that relative keyword
values can fall out of sync with their parent's value. These previously
passed as we treated `bolder` and `lighter` as aliases for `bold` and
`normal` respectively.
Remaining test failures in font-size-interpolation-00* are either:
- Rounding of font-size to CSSPixels when setting the expected value
- Not clamping negative values from the point of view of
getComputedStyle (used values are still clamped)
Previously if we would overwrite the non-animated font-size with the
animated font-size if it was set.
Gains us 8 WPT tests and means we now fail 9 others in line with other
browsers.
There are other places we want to convert font-size into it's computed
form than just when we are loading the font (e.g. computing keyframes).
Gains us 36 WPT passes as we now correctly clamp negative calc values.
A new parameter was added to Web::CSS::StyleValue::to_string() in
PR #2820 but this debug message was never updated. If
CSS_TRANSITIONS_DEBUG was enabled, compilation would fail.
As noted, the chunk of this method that deals with animations could do
with some helpers on AbstractElement, but I'm leaving that until it's
clearer how animations and pseudo-elements should interact.
Transitions apply after logical properties are mapped to their physical
counterparts so we should apply this mapping to `transition` properties
Gains us 20 WPT tests.
Using longhands rather than expanded longhands meant for instance that
we wouldn't transition `border-top-width` if we had `border` as the
transition property.
Continues the work started in #5386 to simplify handling of positional
value list shorthand properties.
Previously we would parse these as `StyleValueList`s and then rely on
`StyleComputer::for_each_property_expanding_shorthands` to expand them
into longhands.
This required a bit of work to handle `ShorthandStyleValue`s for the
`@page` `margin` descriptor.
Implements `::slotted()` to enough extent we could pass the imported WPT
test and make substantial layout correctness improvement on
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/
`font-size` can end up with a negative value - either due to `calc`
being resolved using the old method which doesn't clamp the value, or
interpolation - in this case we should clamp negative values to zero.
Gains us 36 new WPT passes and fixes crashes in the three imported
tests.
We now also store `outline-width` in ComputedValues as a `CSSPixels`
since we know it's an absolute length at `apply_style` time - this saves
us some work in converting to CSSPixels during layout.
Gains us 46 new passes since we now interpolate keywords (thick, thin,
etc) correctly.
Also loses us 4 WPT tests as we longer clamp negative values produced by
interpolation from the point of view of getComputedStyle (although the
'used' value is still clamped).
Gains us 112 new passes since we now interpolate keywords (thick, thin,
etc) correctly.
Also loses us 4 WPT tests as we longer clamp negative values produced by
interpolation from the point of view of getComputedStyle (although the
'used' value is still clamped).
`StyleValue`s stored within `ComputedProperties` should be in their
computed forms, this is for various reasons including:
- Inheritance should be of computed values
- Animations should work on computed values
- Triggering transitions should work on computed values
Currently we store `StyleValue`s in an absolutized version of the
specified value - this is equivalent to the computed form in many cases
which is why this hasn't been causing significant issues but there are
some cases - such as `border-*-width` keywords where this is not the
case.
No functionality change as we are yet to implement any properties
