There is no need for this invalidation because taking care of siblings
is already done by invalidation with `NodeInsertBefore` reason. Parent
element itself (without subtree) is always invalidated by
`Node::children_changed()` hook, so `:empty` pseudo-class invalidation
is already covered.
When checking whether an early return is possible because some ancestor
already has the whole subtree invalidation flag set, the check should
begin with the current node's parent rather than with the node itself.
Otherwise, if a node already has the whole subtree invalidation flag
set and is subsequently invalidated for the reason `NodeInsertBefore`
or `NodeRemove`, we will skip the sibling invalidation required for
these operations
This fix is required for optimizations in subsequent commits.
With this change, siblings of an inserted node are no longer invalidated
unless the insertion could potentially affect their style. By
"potentially affected," we mean elements that are evaluated against the
following selectors during matching:
- Sibling combinators (+ or ~)
- Pseudo-classes :first-child and :last-child
- Pseudo-classes :nth-child, :nth-last-child, :nth-of-type, and
:nth-last-of-type
This test appears to be flaky, similar to some other animation tests we
have. Let's disable it for now because changes in subsequent commits
cause it to fail more often, even though those changes are not related
to the test itself. It is likely another case where altered timings of
certain operations (specifically, style updates) cause the test to fail
because things are no longer executed in the same order as before.
This is not really a context, but more of a set of parameters for
creating a Parser. So, treat it as such: Rename it to ParsingParams,
and store its values and methods directly in the Parser instead of
keeping the ParsingContext around.
This has a nice side-effect of not including DOM/Document.h everywhere
that needs a Parser.
A few of these are only ever called with T=Token, so let's simplify them
a bit.
As a drive-by change: Also correct the "unnecessairy" typos and use
discard_a_token().
This file has been a pain to edit for a while, even with the previous
splits. So, I've divided it up into 3 parts:
- Parser.cpp has the "base" code. It's the algorithms and entry-points
defined in the Syntax spec.
- ValueParsing.cpp contains code for parsing single values, such as a
length, or a color, or a calculation.
- PropertyParsing.cpp contains code for parsing an entire property's
value. A few of these sit in a grey area between being a property's
value and a value in their own right, but the rule I've used is "is
this useful outside of a single property and its shorthands?"
This only moves code, with as few modifications as possible to make that
work. I did add explicit instantiations for the template implementations
as part of this, which revealed a few that are actually only compatible
with a single type, so I'll clear those up in a subsequent commit.
Lots of editorial spec bugs here, but these changes largely affect how
the unhandledPromptBehavior capability is handled. We also now set an
additional capability for the default User Agent string.
WebDriver script authors may now provide either:
* A user prompt handler configuration to be used for all prompt types.
* A set of per-prompt-type user prompt handlers.
This also paves the way for interaction with the beforeunload prompt,
though we do not yet support that feature in LibWeb.
See: 43903d0
_O_OBTAIN_DIR flag makes _open use FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS in
CreateFile call.
FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS is required to open directory handles.
For ordinary files FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS overrides file security
checks when the process has SE_BACKUP_NAME and SE_RESTORE_NAME
privileges, see https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/fileapi/nf-fileapi-createfilea
icu 75.x and higher requires C++17. This change is pulled from an
abandoned PR to uprev vcpkg's version to 75. Presumably the flags
should be set upstream as well in their configure.ac
This catches errors that occur within async tests so that we fail faster
rather than timing out due to `done()` not being called.
We use `Promise.resolve()` because `f` isn't guaranteed to be an async
function.
At computed-value time, this is converted to whatever the parent's
computed value is. So it behaves a little like `inherit`, except that
an inherited start/end value uses the parent's start/end, which might
be different from the child's.
We've historically asserted that no "saturated" size values end up as
final metrics for boxes in layout. This always had a chance of producing
false positives, since you can trivially create extremely large boxes
with CSS.
The reason we had those assertions was to catch bugs in our own engine
code where we'd incorrectly end up with non-finite values in layout
algorithms. At this point, we've found and fixed all known bugs of that
nature, and what remains are a bunch of false positives on pages that
create very large scrollable areas, iframes etc.
So, let's change it! We now clamp content width and height of boxes to
17895700 pixels, apparently the same cap as Firefox uses.
There's also the issue of calc() being able to produce non-finite
values. Note that we don't clamp the result of calc() directly, but
instead just clamp values when assigning them to content sizes.
Fixes#645.
Fixes#1236.
Fixes#1249.
Fixes#1908.
Fixes#3057.
While keyword_to_foo() does return Optional<Foo>, in practice the
invalid keywords get rejected at parse-time, so we don't have to worry
about them here. This simplifies the user code quite a bit.
