This resolves all WPT timeouts in html/canvas/element/manual/imagebitmap
We can now run an additional 6 tests and 126 subtests :)
This also adds regression tests for this behavior.
InlinePaintable was an ad-hoc paintable type required to support the
fragmentation of inline nodes across multiple lines. It existed because
there was no way to associate multiple paintables with a single layout
node. This resulted in a lot of duplicated code between PaintableBox and
InlinePaintable. For example, most of the CSS properties like
background, border, shadows, etc. and hit-testing are almost identical
for both of them. However, the code had to be duplicated to account for
the fact that InlinePaintable creates a box for each line. And we had
quite many places that operate on paintables with a code like:
```
if (box.is_paintable_box()) {
// do something
} else (box.is_inline_paintable()) {
// do exactly the same as for paintable box but using InlinePaintable
}
```
This change replaces the usage of `InlinePaintable` with
`PaintableWithLines` created for each line, which is now possible
because we support having multiple paintables per layout node. By doing
that, we remove lots of duplicated code and bring our implementation
closer to the spec.
DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope is an object with a Global extended
attribute, but does not define any named property getters. This needs to
be handled by setting the prototype chain to:
DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope
^ DedicatedWorkerGlobalScopePrototype
^ WorkerGlobalScopePrototype
(This is different from something like Window, where there is an
intermediate WindowProperties object for named properties.)
Previously, we treated the GlobalMixin object as if it was a simple
prototype object, accidentally setting DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope's
prototype to WorkerGlobalScopePrototype. This caused the expression
self instanceof DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope
to return false inside workers.
This makes us pass many more of the "/xhr/idlharness.any.worker" WPT
tests than before, rather than failing early.
Fixes at least one WPT test that was previously timing out:
- html/semantics/document-metadata/the-base-element/base_target_does_not_affect_iframe_src_navigation.html
For example, in the following abbreviated test HTML:
<span>some text</span>
<script>println("whf")</script>
We would have to craft the expectation file to include the "some text"
segment, usually with some leading whitespace. This is a bit annoying,
and makes it difficult to manually craft expectation files.
So instead of comparing the expectation against the entire DOM inner
text, we now send the inner text of just the <pre> element containing
the test output when we invoke `internals.signalTextTestIsDone`.
We now use the "report an exception" AO when a script has an execution
error. This has mostly replaced the older "report the exception" AO in
various specifications. Using this newer AO ensures that
`window.onerror` is invoked when a script has an execution error.
This fixes an issue where document.write() with only text input would
leave all the character data as unflushed text in the parser.
This fixes many of the WPT tests for document.write().
This change ensures that the value sanitization algorithm is run and
the text cursor is set to the correct position when the type attribute
of an input is changed.
In particular, there was an assertion failure due to the temporary
parser document's "about base URL" being empty when trying to "parse a
URL" during parsing.
We fix this by copying the context element's document's about base URL
to the temporary parsing document while parsing a fragment.
This fixes a crash when loading search results on https://amazon.com/
The IDL constructor has to take separate steps than a DataTransfer that
is internally constructed. Notably, an IDL-created object has its own
drag data store, and that store is placed in a read-write mode.
The drag-and-drop processing model allows for users to drag around
either elements within the DOM or objects completely outside the DOM.
This drag event can either end without action (via cancellation or user
input), or in a drop event, where the dragged object is dropped onto
another element within the DOM.
The processing model is rather large. This implements enough of it to
allow the UI process to specifically handle dragging objects outside of
the DOM onto the DOM. For example, dragging an image from the OS file
manager onto a file-upload input element. This does not implement the
ability to drag DOM elements.
