This change — part of the HTML constraint-validation API (aka
“client-side form validation”) — implements the willValidate IDL/DOM
attribute/property for all form controls that support it.
When setting `font-family: monospace;` in CSS, we have to interpret
the keyword font sizes (small, medium, large, etc) as slightly smaller
for historical reasons. Normally the medium font size is 16px, but
for monospace it's 13px.
The way this needs to behave is extremely strange:
When encountering `font-family: monospace`, we have to go back and
replay the CSS cascade as if the medium font size had been 13px all
along. Otherwise relative values like 2em/200%/etc could have gotten
lost in the inheritance chain.
We implement this in a fairly naive way by explicitly checking for
`font-family: monospace` (note: it has to be *exactly* like that,
it can't be `font-family: monospace, Courier` or similar.)
When encountered, we simply walk the element ancestors and re-run the
cascade for the font-size property. This is clumsy and inefficient,
but it does work for the common cases.
Other browsers do more elaborate things that we should eventually care
about as well, such as user-configurable font settings, per-language
behavior, etc. For now, this is just something that allows us to handle
more WPT tests where things fall apart due to unexpected font sizes.
To learn more about the wonders of font-size, see this blog post:
https://manishearth.github.io/blog/2017/08/10/font-size-an-unexpectedly-complex-css-property/
This essentially reverts 1b46a52cfc
and adds more tests.
The reverted change was an incorrect workaround for the real issue,
which was that we weren't creating anonymous wrapper boxes around inline
children of table-cell boxes.
Now that this has been fixed, we can go back to aligning text properly.
This fixes an issue where CSS vertical-align on a table-cell box would
incorrectly apply to both the table-cell box and any inline content it
had inside.
The spec changes seem to mostly be about introducing a TrustedHTML type
which we do not yet support, so we have a couple of FIXMEs.
TrustedTypes::InjectionSink is an attempt at matching the spec, but it's
not entirely clear to me how it should work. I'm sure it'll get
revisited once we start implementing trusted types.
Our own Inspector differs from most other DevTools implementations with
regard to highlighting DOM nodes as you hover elements in the inspected
DOM tree. In other implementations, as you change the hovered node, the
browser will render a box model overlay onto the page for that node. We
currently don't do this; we wait until you click the node, at which
point we both paint the overlay and inspect the node's properties.
This patch does not change that behavior, but separates the IPCs and
internal tracking of inspected nodes to support the standard DevTools
behavior. So the DOM document now stores an inspected node and a
highlighted node. The former is used for features such as "$0" in the
JavaScript console, and the latter is used for the box model overlay.
Our Inspector continues to set these to the same node.
Previously, the charset of name "UTF-16BE/LE" would be checked against
when following standards to convert the charset to UTF-8, but in
reality, the charsets "UTF-16BE" and "UTF-16LE" should be checked
separately.
Co-authored-by: Jelle Raaijmakers <jelle@ladybird.org>
This reduces the number of `.cpp` files that need to be recompiled when
one of the below header files changes as follows:
CSS/ComputedProperties.h: 1113 -> 49
CSS/ComputedValues.h: 1120 -> 209
This reduces the number of `.cpp` files that need to be recompiled when
one of the below header files changes as follows:
Painting/Command.h: 1030 -> 61
Painting/DisplayList.h: 1030 -> 60
Painting/DisplayListRecorder.h: 557 -> 59
One point to note is that I am not entirely sure what the result
of the pre-existing valueAsNumber test should be for this strange
case which does not lie exactly on a week/day boundary. Chrome
gives a negative timestamp, which seems more wrong than the result
we give, and neither gecko or WebKit appear to support the 'week'
type. So I'm considering this result acceptable for now, and this
may be something that will need more WPT tests added in the future.
Even though we don't actually make use of these values at the moment,
we still want them to be reflected correctly once we start exposing used
margin values soon.
We were incorrectly shrinking the used right margin to make it fit
within the available space, even though this was not necessary and the
margin is allowed to stretch beyond the containing block.
This is not observable yet, but will be once we start exposing used
margin values in a subsequent change.
By the time we're measuring the height of a BFC root, we've already
collapsed all relevant margins for the root and its descendants.
Given this, we should simply use 0 (relative to the BFC root) as the
lowest block axis coordinate (i.e Y value) for the margin edges.
This fixes a long-standing issue where BFC roots were sometimes not tall
enough to contain their children due to margins.
Corresponds to part of https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9841 and then
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/11047
Adding `Auto` as a type state feels a little odd, as it's not an actual
type allowed in HTML. However, it's the default state when the value is
missing or invalid, which works out the same, as long as we never
serialize "auto", which we don't.
Analysis of selectors on modern websites shows that the `:hover`
pseudo-class is mostly used in the subject position within relatively
simple selectors like `.a:hover`. This suggests that we could greatly
benefit from segregating them by id/class/tag name, this way reducing
number of selectors tested during hover style invalidation.
With this change, hover invalidation on Discord goes down from 70ms to
3ms on my machine. I also tested GMail and GitHub where this change
shows nice 2x-3x speedup.
This is required to store Content Security Policies, as their
Directives are implemented as subclasses with overridden virtual
functions. Thus, they cannot be stored as generic Directive classes, as
it'll lose the ability to call overridden functions when they are
copied.
